YOUR GUIDE TO THE TWIN CITIES
Recognize high achievers in schools, but do it legally.
At some point during our school years, most of us have likely had this experience: To encourage excellence and reward hard work, a well-meaning teacher displays graded papers or test scores from top students. Getting the equivalent of a gold star or smiley face sticker for being the best has long been common in classrooms.
That explains the buzz this week over news that the practice can violate Minnesota law.
Last year, a Northfield High School teacher wrote the names and grades of students with the highest scores on the classroom blackboard. A parent of one of the high achievers complained to the state that the teacher made the information public without permission. An advisory opinion from the Minnesota Department of Administration concurred that state law prohibits disclosure of individual scores without parental approval.
Being identified for outstanding work might seem harmless. In fact, many educators argue that acknowledging stellar students rewards them and motivates their classmates to do better.
But when it comes to important student data, privacy should be paramount.
Admittedly, rules covering the issue aren't consistent. Legal experts point out that schools are allowed to announce honor roll students and valedictorians. Federal law allows schools to release the names of National Merit Scholars, and that information often runs in the hometown newspapers of the top scorers.
And the U.S. Supreme Court decided that teachers may have students score each other's tests in class. The court found that approach acceptable because when the peer grading is done the score has not yet been entered into the test taker's transcript.
Privacy becomes an issue when the test result becomes part of an official student record. That's the point at which students and parents must be consulted before the information is made public.
That doesn't mean schools should abandon efforts to recognize outstanding performance. School leaders can get permission from students and parents to use names at the beginning of the year -- much in the same way some schools ask for photo or other releases to cover an entire school year. Another way to stay within the law is to post scores identified only with student ID numbers. Under that approach, students know what the top scores are without necessarily knowing who earned them. If individual students want to share their results with others, it's up to them.
Some argue that competition is the way of the world and that protecting student test score data is more about political correctness than helping kids. But another reality is that private information -- even when it's positive -- is sometimes used in harmful ways.
Just ask the top students who get teased via text messaging or physically victimized because they do well in school.
The Northfield case should not discourage educators from recognizing high achievers. It should simply remind them to follow the law and tread carefully when dealing with privacy issues
ADVERTISEMENT
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.
ADVERTISEMENT