Editorial: More burning is part of larger plan

  • Updated: July 19, 2009 - 9:08 AM

Hennepin County isn't presenting an either-or trash choice.

  • share

    email

If the choice before the Minneapolis City Council's Planning and Zoning Committee next Thursday were simply between more burning and more reducing, recycling and composting of trash, the right pick would be obvious. The committee would follow the city Planning Commission's lead, and disallow sending about 20 percent more trash per day to the Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC, or, in common parlance, the garbage burner).

But the issues surrounding the Hennepin County Board's request to operate the 20-year-old burner at its full capacity are not that simple. The burner request is one piece of a broad new waste disposal strategy being developed by county officials. It aims to bring about the same increase in recycling sought by opponents of more burning.

The plan is not yet official county policy, though a move to make it so has been initiated by Commissioner Peter McLaughlin. Nevertheless, it behooves city officials to examine the county's proposal for the facility that sits next door to the new Twins ballpark in its full context. It's a plausible plan, made so in part because the sale of additional electricity and steam generated at HERC can produce the revenue stream a redoubled push for recycling and composting will require.

City officials should recognize that burning and recycling are not Hennepin County's only disposal options. The third one -- dumping raw garbage into landfills -- is the least environmentally friendly method of waste disposal, and the last resort on the hierarchy of acceptable waste management alternatives set in state policy.

Today, about 20 percent of Hennepin County trash winds up in landfills. That's much more than was intended when the garbage burner began operating in late 1989. But a lawsuit in 1994 ordered the county to honor its long-term contracts with garbage haulers, and interrupted the county's plans to reduce landfill use.

Those contracts are nearing expiration. So is an agreement to deliver 175,000 tons per year of Hennepin trash to another waste-to-energy incinerator in Elk River. Hennepin's use of the Elk River burner will end next month.

That makes this an opportune moment for a push for recycling and composting more waste. McLaughlin says he and his fellow board members are intent on keeping the trash that had been going to Elk River out of landfills. Sending an additional 40,000 tons per year to HERC will help them achieve that goal, at least until the anticipated new program to encourage county residents to become more thorough recyclers and composters is implemented.

Opponents of increasing the amount of garbage burned at HERC are rightfully concerned about the adequacy of the environmental review that has been done to date on the county's request. It relies too heavily on the environmental impact statement done for Target Field. Fans attending occasional baseball games don't have nearly as much exposure to the burner's emissions as nearby city residents do.

But a thorough environmental review is the responsibility of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and that's the next hurdle for the county's request. The MPCA won't get into the act until an amended conditional use permit from the city is in hand.

On average, Minneapolis dwellers recycle 10 percent less of their garbage than residents do countywide. That means Minneapolis officials in particular should understand that the county will need to spend some money to sell residents on more recycling and composting. And city officials, more than most, should understand how tight government resources are, and are going to stay in years ahead.

Using the garbage burner to its full capacity will generate an additional $1.5 million per year that can finance new recycling and composting efforts. If the county is willing to commit to using those revenues in that way, the city should grant the permit it seeks.

  • THE LARGER CONTEXT

    Hennepin County's Public Works, Energy and Environment Committee is scheduled to consider Commissioner Peter McLaughlin's proposed new waste strategy on Aug. 4. His resolution is posted at

    tiny.cc/aQl78.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions
  • share

    email

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close