ed031709

On the homepage

Sunday's paper

Olympic moms get all-around gold

Out There

Homegirls

The politics of green

Gardens

Her garden became his inspiration

Home | Opinion Exchange | Editorials

Editorial: Leadership crucial for high-speed rail

Pawlenty needs to lead in identifying, unifying rail priorities.

Last update: March 17, 2009 - 6:48 AM

Print this story

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter

HIGH-SPEED REALITIES

"We are certainly seeing a lot of parties defend their turf ... What we're trying to achieve and what we think is necessary to be successful grant recipients is to work our way towards a state vision that could identify the one or two projects that we really need to do first. We need to transform this perspective of what they're looking for in their community into what's best for the state."

Mike Schadauer, director,

MnDOT's Office of Transit

More from Editorials

Spurring economic development in the upper Midwest and alleviating road and airport congestion are just two of the possible positive benefits of high-speed rail in Minnesota, which is suddenly within reach because up to $8 billion is allocated for U.S. rail projects as part of the stimulus bill.

Now comes the hard part: Working through a thicket of engineering, environmental, financial and political issues in order to apply to the Federal Rail Administration (FRA), which will release its strategic plan on April 18 and the federal funding application guidelines on June 17.

Among the most critical questions is the route itself. Despite being on the drawing boards for years as a St. Paul-Chicago line, there is statewide debate on whether the route should serve Rochester -- the vital, vibrant home of the Mayo Clinic and a burgeoning bioscience industry -- by rerouting the line through the city or adding a spur west from Winona.

One certainty seems to be that St. Paul's Union Depot will be a main terminal. But should it be the only one? Minneapolis is the commercial hub not just of the metro area, but of a multistate region. Is it feasible, cost-effective and acceptable to the FRA to extend the line from St. Paul to the planned intermodal transit hub to be built near Target Field?

And if so, can it be linked to the proposed Northern Lights line, which would connect the Twin Cities with the Twin Ports of Duluth-Superior? And what of including Fargo-Moorhead as well as St. Cloud, two regional cities integral to the state's economy? It's not just a high-speed rail decision, however. Using federal funds for necessary track upgrades may have an impact on the proposed Red Rock and Bethel-Cambridge commuter rail lines through the southeastern and northern suburbs.

With high-speed rail application deadlines fast approaching, it's now up to the state to answer the myriad policy questions and prepare the proposal to the FRA. Gov. Tim Pawlenty has indicated an interest in high-speed rail and delegated the proposal process to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. This should build confidence in the technical and management aspects of the state's response. Commissioner Tom Sorel appears ready to provide the leadership needed after Lt. Gov. Carol Molnau's tumultuous tenure. The agency is working on a statewide rail plan, but it won't be complete by the application deadline.

Sorel has invited more than 30 organizations to take part in a forum to consider the many issues, but decisions will need to be made quickly. There is keen competition between the federally designated high-speed rail corridors, many of which would have higher ridership projections and do not face the same route uncertainties that have surfaced in Minnesota.

By design, MnDOT is a relatively apolitical organization. High-speed rail issues, however, are rife with politics, including the Minneapolis vs. St. Paul and Twin Cities metro vs. outstate Minnesota rivalries.

Strong gubernatorial leadership -- not in lieu of, but in addition to Sorel's efforts -- would help set the tone. Just as Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle has already done, Pawlenty needs to ensure that the many stakeholders in high-speed rail work together cohesively -- and quickly. Failing to do so could result in a missed opportunity that could negatively impact the state for generations to come.

Recent Editorials stories

Editorial: Make the right choice for St. Paul - March 17, 2009

Editorial: Make the right choice for St. Paul - Capital city schools need a leader who will get the job done. More

Comment on this story | Read all 2 comments | Hide reader comments

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS