After a lousy 2014 turnout, move the primary date

  • Article by: EDITORIAL BOARD , Star Tribune
  • Updated: August 15, 2014 - 6:05 PM

This week’s low participation augurs for a June election.


A lone voter cast his ballot at a polling place inside a south Minneapolis church on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2014. As of mid-afternoon, the election judge at the church said that only 130 of the precinct’s 1,600 registered voters had voted.

Photo: Jim Mone • Associated Press,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Republican Party state chair Keith Downey is good at generating positive partisan spin. But he overreached Wednesday when he boasted that voter turnout in Tuesday’s GOP primary election bested the previous high for Republicans in an August primary by 40 percent.

That’s accurate — but Minnesota has had only two previous August primaries, 2010 and 2012, and neither of them included serious Republican nomination contests for major statewide offices, as Tuesday’s election did. Even with a 40 percent gain over those years, Tuesday’s GOP showing was meager. By Wednesday’s count, only 183,086 of the state’s 3.88 million eligible voters cast ballots in the GOP column.

The numbers from the DFL column were no better. The day-after DFL voter count was 191,162. DFL state chair Ken Martin did some spinning of his own, calling the DFL’s tiny turnout edge a “big red flag” for Republicans. “Their own party faithful are not excited enough to show up and vote in a primary,” he said.

But Martin also offered reporters a more candid take on Tuesday’s pathetic turnout: “It’s really too bad. … I think it’s a real travesty for democracy.”

It is indeed. Low turnout undermines an election’s legitimacy. It enhances the clout of well-organized special interests while underrepresenting average citizens. In primaries, it tends to rubber-stamp party endorsements, rather than serving as the check on party insiders’ judgments that Minnesota’s candidate selection system was designed to provide.

In the long run, low-turnout elections erode respect for government. Minnesotans should be embarrassed that Tuesday’s intraparty election appears to have attracted just under 10 percent of eligible voters, or 12.2 percent of previously registered voters. (Final tallies will be certified by the State Canvassing Board, which is set to meet Tuesday.)

Martin added his wish for a calendar change that might boost participation in future primaries — a shift to a date in June. GOP chair Downey also likes that idea. So do DFL Gov. Mark Dayton and a goodly number of candidates for statewide office. This newspaper has backed a June primary date for many years.

But an earlier primary faces potent opposition among legislators and county election administrators, particularly from Greater Minnesota. Legislative sessions last until mid-May and sometimes go into overtime. Legislators fear that if they face a challenge in a June primary, they’ll be marooned in St. Paul, unable to defend themselves personally in their districts.

Those fears seem overwrought. An incumbent’s best defense is strong performance in office. Being seen as working for one’s district at the Capitol, contributing to the enactment of problem-solving legislation, ought to be a plus in fending off an intraparty opponent.

County auditors, who double as election officials in counties outside the metro area, have a different concern. Their duties include processing spring property tax payments. An earlier primary would present staffing challenges that could add costs. But those costs must be balanced against the need for credible, broad-based elections, which are fundamental to sustainable democracy.

GOP attorney general candidate Scott Newman, who has focused on election law as a state senator, recently told an editorial writer that he has dropped his long-held opposition to a June primary. He now favors the change, he said, because running for statewide office has shown him that too much time and money are spent in the intraparty phase of Minnesota elections.

We agree. Voters deserve more time to focus on the choices they face in November. We’d add that Minnesotans deserve an election calendar that’s respectful of this state’s seasonal patterns. August vacations are the rewards Minnesotans earn for enduring long, cold winters. With three straight low-turnout August primaries, the same voters who lead the nation in November election participation have tacitly said that they’d rather not be bothered with party nomination elections during their leisure season. The state’s political calendar-keepers should hear that message and move to primary to June.


    Though nearly 20 years old, the 1995 recommendations of a blue-ribbon, bipartisan reform commission convened by then-Secretary of State Joan Growe remain relevant. With a nudge from the federal government, the 2010 Legislature finally accepted the commission’s call for an August primary. But the recommendation for a shorter time span between precinct caucuses and primary elections has not been adopted. Under its recommended calendar for an August primary, precinct caucuses would be in early April, not early February, as they were this year. It offered an alternative calendar featuring early March caucuses and a late June primary.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters