ed080308

On the homepage

Health care

Health care bill stuck on Democrats' infighting

Out There

Crimefighting

Video advances are a big crime-solving aid

Mental health

A 'national crisis' of student suicide

Home | Opinion Exchange | Editorials

Editorial: Playing politics with women's health care

Proposal puts medical staff beliefs above patient needs.

Last update: August 2, 2008 - 5:16 PM

Print this story

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter

IN OPPOSITION

Organizations lobbying against the proposed rule include: the American Medical Association, American Nurses Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Planned Parenthood.

More from Editorials

What century is this? That's the first of many disturbing questions prompted by a new federal health proposal clearly targeting women's access to birth control and abortion. The Pill was approved in the United States in 1960. Abortion, legalized by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973. Yet the nation's leading medical organizations -- from the American Medical Association to the American Nurses Association -- are now fighting to ensure that women continue to get these important medical services and information about them.

This Trojan horse of a proposal comes from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which sets federal health policy and controls billions in funding for everything from low-income clinics to big teaching hospitals. The new policy is ostensibly designed to protect medical staff from discrimination if they refuse to participate in abortion or sterilization procedures. But for decades, there have been strong national laws in place to safeguard medical staff. As justification for the new policy, officials do not cite even one case of discrimination that existing laws have failed to prevent.

The real intent of the proposed policy rapidly becomes clear to anyone who reads a draft leaked recently to the news media. It appears that federal officials invited in the most extreme elements of the prolife coalition and said, "Bring your wish list.'' The result is a hamhanded, 40-page document that limits women's health care by vastly expanding the opportunities for medical staff to refuse to provide care or information because of their abortion views.

Under the rule, that right of refusal could now include objections to common forms of birth control. The proposal radically redefines abortion to include contraception that may interfere with the implantation of a fertilized egg. Among those methods: IUDs and Plan B, which contains a birth control pill hormone and is often given to rape victims. The rule also expands the definition of federally funded facilities and enlarges the universe of medical staff who can object.

The bottom line: Staff from physicians to surgical instrument cleaners to health insurance employees could refuse to provide or discuss these services. At no time would anyone have to disclose to the patient that an incomplete array of care options was being offered.

Groups such as Planned Parenthood also worry that the new rule could override state laws that require pharmacies to fill birth control prescriptions or health insurers to cover contraception equitably. At the same time, it should be noted, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has expressed strong support for the proposal.

But politics do not make for good health care or health care policy. The proposed rule puts the personal views of medical staff above the needs of even the most vulnerable patients. That's wrong. President Bush could enact this new rule before he leaves office. Instead, he should heed the advice of the nation's doctors and nurses and stop this backwards, misguided proposal from becoming a reality.

Recent Editorials stories

Editorial: Stimulus helped state - August 2, 2008

Editorial: Stimulus helped state - A 'rough ride,' but federal money helped cushion the blow. More

Comments are temporarily unavailable

Our reader comments feature is currently undergoing maintenance. Please check back to comment on this story and join the discussion. We apologize for any inconvenience.

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS