ed0502a08

On the homepage

Vikings

Vikings respond to challenge

Out There

Artcetera

Biggest album release day of the year

Table Talk

Thanksgiving recipes: Pear Tarte Tatin

Home | Opinion Exchange | Editorials

Editorial: Everyone out of the revenue-sharing pool

If mall proposal goes through, a parade of projects will follow.

Last update: May 1, 2008 - 6:31 PM

Print this story

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter

A BAD PRECEDENT

"The use of fiscal disparities to subsidize one development at the expense of everyone else breaks a 35-year regional contract among communities and sets the precedent for widespread misuse of the fiscal disparities pool.''

From a statement released by the Citizens League

More from Editorials

Hundreds of construction workers turned out at the State Capitol earlier this week to show their support for a plan to use public money to build a parking ramp at the Mall of America. Given the sorry state of the economy, the workers have plenty of time to attend rallies.

As argued previously in this space, there are many reasons Minnesotans should hope the owners of the megamall will proceed with the $2.1 billion expansion plan in Bloomington. The state benefits when members of the building trades are carrying hammers instead of rally placards, and the project would be an economic-development victory for the region.

The problem is that the proposed funding source for the $204 million parking lot is the metrowide fiscal disparities pool, which was created in the 1970s to allow slower-growing cities to share in the commercial-industrial tax growth of neighboring communities. Tapping the fund to build a parking ramp would establish a bad precedent -- one not lost on Dennis Berg, chairman of the Anoka County Board.

Berg recently sent a letter to the county's legislative delegation suggesting that if Bloomington gets a break from the fiscal disparities pool for the Mall of America project, legislators should seek public support for a north metro project in the future. He mentioned SportsTown USA, a proposed retail and entertainment development in Blaine. The Legislature can expect more of the same if the megamall proposal is approved.

Despite opposition from the respected Citizens League, the Greater Minneapolis Building Owners & Managers Association and the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties, the megamall plan has support from key Republican and DFL legislators. It could be up to Gov. Tim Pawlenty to determine the fate of the legislation, and so far he hasn't shown his hand. The governor has, however, expressed concern about a possible "parade of projects'' that will want a break from fiscal disparities if the mall receives one.

The megamall's owner, Triple Five Group, is a Canadian firm with significant real estate holdings and banking, venture capital and other business interests. Because the company is privately held, its finances remain a mystery. It's possible that the megamall's Phase II would proceed without a subsidy, which would be the best outcome for the state, the metro communities that depend on the fiscal disparities pool, and the construction workers who converged in St. Paul this week.

Recent Editorials stories

Editorial: Stimulus helped state - May 1, 2008

Editorial: Stimulus helped state - A 'rough ride,' but federal money helped cushion the blow. More

Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS