ed021708

On the homepage

NewsBreak

NewsBreak: A good dog behaves badly

Out There

Fort Hood

Mourners converge on Fort Hood

Vita.mn

Herb Alpert, Lani Hall at the Dakota

Home | Opinion Exchange | Editorials

Editorial: Bioscience campus should win support

Accord with House leaders should remove roadblock.

Last update: February 16, 2008 - 4:55 PM

Print this story

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter

PROPOSED BUILDINGS

• Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, $53.2 million.

• Cancer Biomedical Research Building, $85 million.

• Lillehei Biomedical Research Building (for cardiovascular research), $86.1 million.

• Infectious Diseases and Neuroscience Biomedical Research Building, $68 million.

• Medical Biosciences Building, $60 million (authorized in 2006; under construction).

More from Editorials

Chances are better today than they were a few weeks ago that in 2028 and beyond, Minnesota will be among the states that are home to a globally competitive biosciences industry.

That's the result of months of negotiating by Minnesota House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher, DFL-Minneapolis, several senior House DFLers, and University of Minnesota officials. Word went out last week from House Capital Investments chair Alice Hausman: "We have a deal."

Their accord, now before the 2008 Legislature for approval, would authorize the construction of four buildings in a biosciences campus already under construction north and east of the new TCF Bank football stadium. (A fifth building was authorized in 2006.) Under the arrangement, the state would be committed to paying the debt service on $233 million of the $292 million bond issue the project requires.

But -- significantly -- the bonds' issuer would be the university, not the state. It's the same arrangement used to finance the new stadium. But it's a change from previous versions of the biosciences campus proposal, and it's crucial to winning over previously skeptical House members. With this change, the biosciences buildings won't vie with other projects for limited state bonding dollars.

Better still, the buildings can be built more quickly than originally proposed. That's crucial if Minnesota is to succeed in the competition for research talent that's in full swing among states contending for a biosciences future. The new arrangement would allow all four buildings to be completed by January 2013.

The buildings will be a robust contributor to the state's economy in their own right, housing about 4,800 new hires and generating $100 million to $120 million a year in federal research grants.

But their bigger promise lies in the job-producing potential of new companies that will be spawned by the knowledge they generate. They can be the locus of the next generation of "medical alley" comercial ventures for Minnesota, based less on devices and more on molecular and cellular manipulation to ease human suffering. Venture capital firms are already inquiring about the plans, attests Frank Cerra, the university's senior vice president for health sciences.

Another plus: Research vigor in the interdisciplinary biosciences field is bound to spur growth in related fields -- science, technology, engineering, mathematics -- also vital to the knowledge-based economy Minnesota seeks.

At a time when a weak economy is tightening budgets and fueling worry, the university's biosciences plan represents hope. Legislators and the governor will be given no better opportunity this session to do something positive for Minnesota's economic future. It's an opportunity they should seize.

Recent Editorials stories

Editorial: U should lead on conflicts of interest - February 16, 2008

Editorial: U should lead on conflicts of interest - Disclosure, leadership needed to police doctors' ties to industry. More

Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS