Editorial: Suburban school case is a cautionary tale

Lind's actions bode ill for Prior Lake-Savage district.

Last update: January 4, 2008 - 5:44 PM

Print this story

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter

ON LIND'S DISMISSAL

"Chris was advised about the need to maintain appropriate boundaries between adults and students ... This is not about constitutional rights relating to freedom of speech or religion, nor is it an attempt to unfairly restrict employee behavior outside the workplace. This is about job performance and employee insubordination.''

Mike Murray, Prior Lake-Savage school board chair

More from Editorials

To some in Prior Lake-Savage, school board member-elect Chris Lind is a hero for sharing his abstinence-only, anti-gay views with students. To others, he is a proselytizing bigot and disgruntled ex-employee who was rightly dismissed from a school district job.

Either way, the controversy around Lind has not been good for the suburban school district. The 44-year-old former teacher and self-described conservative Christian is now threatening legal action against a district he pledged to help lead. In a recent letter to the district, Lind asked for a monetary settlement (in lieu of a lawsuit) over his dismissal. That raises serious concerns about his judgment and his reasons for running.

His election also raises the question: What made more than 3,000 voters support someone who had been fired for improper interaction with students?

Last June, Superintendent Tom Westerhaus and the board terminated Lind, who worked as a hallway and parking lot supervisor. During the previous year, there were complaints about conversations Lind held with students about sexual orientation, both on and off campus. He was warned several times, reprimanded and once suspended. But an investigation by the board found that he continued to discuss sexuality with students, including once saying "Today is National Pick On Lesbians Day.'' That, said the board, was the last straw, and he was terminated.

After losing his job, Lind ran for school board and won. Westerhaus resigned, effective in June, understandably explaining that he did not want to work for a community that elected someone he had fired. A popular and effective superintendent, hundreds of residents wanted him to stay.

When Lind joins the board later this month, relationships with the administration, staff and fellow board members (some of whom voted to terminate him) will be strained at best. Surely under such circumstances, his ability to be an effective school leader will be compromised.

In addition, it was hypocritical for Lind to run on a platform of saving local taxpayers' money, while planning to cost the district even more through a lawsuit or settlement.

The controversy is also a cautionary tale for voters. Several thousand Prior Lake-Savage citizens voted for Lind, most likely because of his stand on sex education and his opposition to a tax levy referendum. But by supporting him on those issues, did voters hastily overlook other warning signs -- including the well-researched, documented concerns of their own elected school board?

Given events since the November election, we cannot help but wonder if citizens in the south suburban district would make different choices if they were going to the polls today.

Recent Editorials stories

Editorial: Kids Count's No. 2 is a warning signal - January 4, 2008

Editorial: Kids Count's No. 2 is a warning signal - Needed: A focus on minimizing poverty's toxic effects on kids. More

Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS