Editorial: Web makes life easier for the watchdogs

If you play the earmarks game, try not to come in first.

Last update: December 19, 2007 - 6:43 PM

It must have been easier to do politics before the Internet came along. Increasingly, it seems, every aspect of public service -- who lobbies whom, who takes whose campaign donations, and much more -- is available online for public inspection. And for every politician whose job is harder in the age of the Web, there's a boatload of journalists whose jobs are easier. And not only journalists, but citizen-watchdogs. It's one thing for information to be public, but it's another for it to be available. These days it's so available, it's scary.

Consider the earmark. In an article in Wednesday's Star Tribune about long-running ethics scandals, U.S. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., was cited for "abuse" of earmarks in defense spending, having channeled "millions" to his district. Earmarks are a notoriously opaque way of spending the taxpayers' money because they get little notice or debate. So, let's just mosey over to www.earmarkwatch.org and see what Murtha's been up to.

Holy Toledo -- er, Johnstown. Did the story say "millions"? From the 2008 Defense appropriations bill, Murtha carved out $166.5 million in earmarks, according to the site. That puts him in first place nationally as a bringer of bacon, as least as far as defense contracts are concerned. Meanwhile, Pennsylvania pulled in a total of $324.8 million in defense earmarks.

Meanwhile, not that it's a contest, Minnesota picked up just $26.4 million in House defense appropriations, according to earmarkwatch. Contributing to that total were two $3 million amounts for Phygen, $3.5 million set aside for Alliant Techsystems, and $3 million for Camp Ripley's pursuit of a "Satellite Multi-Modal Collaborative Crisis and Training Network."

Against this backdrop, Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., has announced that he won't play the earmark game. Earmarks are "corrupting," he says, and he won't have anything to do with them.

Which, we can only imagine, must be a big load off Pennsylvania's shoulders.

Recent Editorials stories

Editorial: Air passengers deserve explanation - December 19, 2007

Editorial: Air passengers deserve explanation - Reasons for six-hour fiasco in Rochester still unclear. More

Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS