ED1102A07

On the homepage

Sunday's paper

Only in Sunday's Star Tribune: Deadly falls

Out There

Gophers

Gophers handed a humbling victory

Commuter rail

Northstar Line: Will we make the switch?

Home | Opinion Exchange | Editorials

Editorial: An economic case for high school reform

State should focus on proven programs for school change.

Last update: November 1, 2007 - 8:08 PM

Print this story

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter

TO STUDY MORE

The full alliance report, "The High Cost of High School Dropouts: What the Nation Pays for Inadequate High Schools,'' is available at all4ed.org. Information about Minnesota Department of Education efforts can be found at education.state.mn.us by clicking on the on high school initiatives link.

More from Editorials

Think about what an infusion of nearly $4 billion in earned wages could do for Minnesota. Tax revenue, consumer buying power and the state's general bottom line would look a lot better. More revenue would be available for education, health care, roads and bridges, parks and recreation and the environment.

That kind of financial boost could come to this state if only more teens graduated from the 12th grade. Future prosperity is one good reason to support and expand effective high school reforms.

A recent Alliance for Excellent Education study documented the state-by-state economic impact of high school dropouts. Researchers at the Washington-based school change advocacy group determined that if all Minnesota 2003 freshmen had received their diplomas in 2007, the state would have an additional $3.9 billion to work with over the students' lifetimes. Nationally, $330 billion in wages would be added to the economy, the group's study estimated.

Minnesota graduation rates are among the highest in the nation. Even so, about 15 to 20 percent of state students leave school and consequently have lower earning power. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the average annual income for a dropout was almost $10,000 less than for a graduate. That disparity makes nongraduates more likely to become locked in poverty, rely on government aid or commit crimes -- all actions that drain state coffers.

That's why it makes sense to invest in producing more graduates now, rather than paying much more later for courts, corrections and social services.

It is not news that some high school practices need change. Calls for reform in recent years have prompted some schools to try smaller student groupings, known as "schools-within-a-school." Others are working to improve academic rigor, reach out to families and provide better teacher training. The state Department of Education has given grants to encourage change, and sponsored pilot model high school programs.

Still, dropout rates aren't dropping enough. That means current programs should be assessed, and only the successful ones should be continued or replicated. As an evaluator found in 2005, some Minneapolis high schools benefitted from setting up small school communities, while others continued to struggle with poor attendance and low graduation rates.

At the other end of the education spectrum, local research has demonstrated that society gains at least $7 for every $1 invested in preschool education. The alliance study shows that a similar argument applies to educating teenagers, too.

Recent Editorials stories

Editorial: A farmer's great legacy - November 1, 2007

Editorial: A farmer's great legacy - We can learn a lot from Harvey Ordung's modest, charitable life. More

Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS