StarTribune.com
ED1028A07

Home | Opinion Exchange | Editorials

Editorial: School levy reliance puts basics at risk

Levy referendums don't build a solid K-12 foundation.

Last update: October 27, 2007 - 5:30 PM

Minnesotans aren't asked to vote every few years on how many police, lifeguards or snowplow drivers their city and county governments employ.

Why, then, are voters increasingly being asked to decide whether their school districts can keep a current complement of teachers, or add more?

That's typical of the types of questions being asked of voters in 99 school districts on Nov. 6, in referendums that seek permission to either continue existing property tax levies or add to the tax burden.

They beg another question, about governance: Why does Minnesota regularly put a share of what is arguably the most important function of local government up for popular vote?

In general, this is a state that has opted for republican -- with a small "r" -- government. It has eschewed direct democracy in favor of choosing representatives in open, vigorously contested elections, and entrusting them to study, deliberate, and decide matters affecting the shared life of the community.

Elected school boards once had full authority to set school tax levies -- even though the state Constitution vested responsibility for education with the Legislature. That began to change after World War II; a big loss in school board autonomy over property tax levies was the price of the state money surge brought by the 1971 Minnesota Miracle.

But school boards retained the power to go to the voters to ask for academic "extras." It is that authority that has been widely employed for operating money in the past decade, as state school funding has lagged well behind inflation.

On average, the state still provides about 70 percent of all school dollars, meeting the goal set in 1971. But a growing share of the remainder is subject to voter approval at regular intervals, typicaly every five years. That wasn't part of the "miracle" plan. It shouldn't be acceptable now.

The Legislature needs to arrest this trend. At a minimum, it should allow the conversion of some portion of short-term levies into permanent ones, putting them under school board rather than direct voter control. But that should be only a start on a bigger project: living up to the promise of stable, adequate school funding, via a tax that does not fall unfairly on those least able to pay.

Comment on this story  |  Be the first to comment  |  Hide reader comments

Subscribe
Streamlining Minnesota

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter Do you use Twitter? Follow Opinion Exchange.

Dog Classified

New Home Wanted

Hundreds of puppies and dogs seeking new homes. Find one now!

Win tickets to see Sonic Youth at First Avenue.

Vita.mn presents Sonic Youth at First Avenue on July 21.

See all contests