Editorial: On the prairie, slow the plow

Federal subsidies should protect grassland, not endanger it.

Last update: September 20, 2007 - 5:51 PM

Print this story

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter

BAD INCENTIVES

The Government Accountability Office found that federal crop subsidies, disaster payments and crop insurance reduce the risk of farming on marginal land, which encourages farmers to plow up fragile grassland. The study is available at gao.gov.

More from Editorials

In a crescent that sweeps from Detroit Lakes to Mankato, Minnesota has thousands of acres of prairie grassland that should never go under a farmer's plow. These grasses provide habitat for endangered wildfowl, filter the state's groundwater, serve as a buffer against flooding and hold topsoil that would otherwise blow away in stiff prairie winds.

Yet in the last decade farmers have been plowing up this land by the thousands of acres, converting pastures and rangeland to row crops at an accelerating pace.

One reason is the boom in ethanol and other biofuels, which has made corn and soybeans hugely more profitable than they were five years ago. But another reflects a perverse wrinkle in federal farm payments. Rep. Collin Peterson of Minnesota and Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa want to change that. They have proposed a simple, sensible change that would protect prairie grasslands while saving money for taxpayers, and it should be part of the farm bill that Congress will pass this fall.

A new study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) shows just how bad the problem is. More than 1 million acres of pasture and rangeland were converted to row crops between 1997 and 2003 in the Northern Plains states alone.

Attractive commodity prices and new seed technology were two reasons for the change. But a big factor was federal disaster payments and crop insurance that took the risk out of cultivating land that, for decades, was regarded as too risky. "Farm program payments provide significant incentive to convert grassland to cropland because they increase the expected profitability of farming while lowering the associated risks," the GAO found.

Harkin points out that there are good reasons why farmers left much of this land in prairie grass for decades: The soils are poor, the land is hilly, the regions are subject to drought. If the only reason farmers are converting valuable grassland to crops is that the government has absolved them of the natural risk, that's not good enough. Peterson has proposed a rule that would make converted grassland ineligible for federal crop insurance for four years; Harkin would go further, making converted grasslands permanently ineligible for a variety of federal payments.

Farmers of the Great Plains are stewards of some of the most valuable wilderness in the United States. They will always face a tension between profit and stewardship, but government subsidies should not tip that balance in the wrong direction.

Recent Editorials stories

Editorial: A clear favorite for southwest light rail - September 20, 2007

Editorial: A clear favorite for southwest light rail - Cedar Lake route looks like best option, but don't forget Uptown. More

Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS