ED082707

On the homepage

Brett Favre

Coordinator Bevell visited Favre with trainer

Out There

Teacher layoffs

Layoffs put new teachers in tougher spot

Supreme Court

Sotomayor hearings begin Monday in Senate

Home | Opinion Exchange | Editorials

Editorial: When Fido turns into Cujo

Tough laws must discourage ownership of dangerous dogs.

Last update: August 26, 2007 - 4:10 PM

Print this story

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter

TO AVOID 'BAD' DOGS

• Never leave small children alone with dogs.

• Neuter male dogs to minimize aggressive behavior.

• Actively socialize dogs.

• Never bother a dog that is sleeping, eating or caring for puppies.

Sources: U. S. Postal Service workers; Centers for Disease Control

More from Editorials

One Twin Cities area boy is dead and another is nursing wounds after recently being attacked by vicious dogs. And since owners fail to control animals that do this kind of damage, the law must do it.

Cities should step up enforcement of current ordinances, create new laws to make it tougher to have such pets and destroy animals when they become too great a threat to public safety.

Earlier this month, his family's pit bull attacked and killed 7-year-old Zachary King Jr. in the basement of his home. The animal was kept chained in the basement because it had bitten people before. And last week, an 85-pound pit bull mix attacked 4-year-old Taylor Bailey outside the boy's Columbia Heights apartment. That animal had bitten the boy's father a week before.

In both cases, the animals had histories of being vicious and were officially dangerous dogs under the state and local legal definitions. And in the Minneapolis case, the owner was complying with city law on dangerous pets by keeping the animal indoors and on a short leash.

Clearly, there are some dogs that have demonstrated they just can't be trusted around other living beings -- especially children. And if the owners won't do it, the city should put them down.

These types of attacks often generate calls to prohibit ownership of certain types of dogs (such as pit bulls) in cities. But a breed ban is not the answer. While a healthy percentage of dogs that do damage are of certain types, aggressive biters come from every canine category.

Studies done by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that purebred and mixed-breed pit bulls and Rottweilers were responsible for about half of 238 dog-bite deaths in the United States from 1979 to 1998. But overall, more than 25 breeds of dogs were involved in those deaths.

It is hard to understand the psychology of those who want to own truly vicious dogs. But because such owners exist, the authorities must fashion more stringent responses. Minneapolis officials are forming a task force to study the issue. To strengthen current laws, the local group and state Legislature should consider regulations that make it as tough as possible for irresponsible owners to keep vicious animals.

Cities could consider higher fines for the owners of dogs whose attacks require medical attention. Repeat offenders could be banned from owning dogs at all, since they don't know how to properly train and manage pets. Authorities could require homeowners' or renters' insurance that specifically covers dog attacks. The insurance industry reports having paid nearly $320 million in claims in 2005 to compensate dog-bite victims for medical expenses, pain and suffering. Therefore, some companies do not insure certain types of dogs or charge huge premiums.

Conflicts between dogs and humans are inevitable. In fact, CDC officials estimate that by the end of this year, more than 4.7 million dog bites will have been reported nationally -- most of them accidental, non-life-threatening incidents. But because some owners insist on keeping dangerous dogs, sometimes even after they've bitten people, the law should tightly regulate them and destroy the animals if necessary.

Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS