log111309

On the homepage

Vikings

Favre's stats put him in MVP picture

Out There

Pardon Board

Petters

Petters jury will resume deliberations Tuesday

Home | Opinion Exchange | Commentary

Los Angeles Times: Clinton, Bush should have debated

Last update: November 12, 2009 - 7:13 PM

Print this story

Follow Opinion Exchange on Twitter

Debate is a venerable oratorical form, a verbal art, if you will. It's a shame that the modern incarnation of debate -- the anger-fraught, sound-bite, gotcha version -- has so tainted its image that former presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton felt obliged to withdraw from several scheduled appearances together, largely over the use of that word.

The former presidents were never planning to debate, a spokesman for Clinton said, expressing distaste for the use of the term by a promoter. Rather, he said, they were going to participate in a moderated discussion of serious policy issues.

Because Clinton and Bush disagree on a mountain of those issues, any truly serious discussion would have had to delve into those differences. Each man would have had to muster his best facts, context and persuasive skills to back up his viewpoint.

The two ex-presidents also may have been disturbed by the ads proclaiming these the "hottest tickets in political history." That was certainly hyperbolic enough to draw a smile; it strains the imagination to picture scalpers raking in cash from people desperate for an evening of civic discourse by two men who no longer hold any position of power. But the overstatement smacked more of wishful thinking than misrepresentation. There was a time when informed and engaged Americans thought one of the most entertaining ways to spend an evening was to listen to prestigious leaders speak their minds. Now we have "NCIS."

Let's face it: Former world leaders have limited options for reclaiming the spotlight and making some money. There's the inevitable book or two, perhaps a chance to do a little foreign diplomacy, as Clinton did in bringing two American journalists home from North Korea. Then there's the lecture circuit, where two unlikely companions from disparate parts of the political spectrum sell a lot more tickets than a predictable moderate Democrat or a predictable social conservative giving a black-tie speech. And it's a lot more lucrative than a commencement address.

In other words, whether Clinton and Bush admit it or not, the value of the tickets to these events relied on a certain amount of disagreement, no matter how they were billed or how much genuine respect the two men have for each other. By pulling out, they have missed an opportunity to remind the public how a true civic -- and civil -- debate is supposed to sound.

LOS ANGELES TIMES

Recent Commentary stories

Michael Gerson: Sudan, a land without law - November 12, 2009

Michael Gerson: Sudan, a land without law - More

Lou Dobbs: Mirroring the medium - November 12, 2009

Lou Dobbs: Mirroring the medium - Whether he hangs his hat at Fox News or throws it in the political ring, speculation is rampant about Lou Dobbs' future after his surprise on-air announcement that he's leaving CNN. But his past is just as intriguing, because it mirrors the medium he helped come of age. More

Comment on this story | Read all 1 comments | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS