Page 2 of 2 Previous

Continued: The 'State of Hockey' is … excessive

  • Last update: February 25, 2014 - 4:45 PM

I asked: “If there were more spots offered, would more boys sign up?”

I was assured that if there was more ice time, probably twice that many spots could be filled at the “C” level.

Quick at ciphering, I offered: “Just a thought, but what if there were an option to play half of the normal time, and thus make ice available for twice as many boys? This is ‘C’ level hockey — maybe more guys just want to try it out.”

She said: “Hockey is a big commitment if you want to get better, and the full-time team is the only option.”

That evening, I sat down with my son and explained the level of commitment and time required to “try hockey.”

His response was: “Ha! I’m not doing that! When would I ski or do Scout stuff or homework? Forget it — most of those hockey guys are jerks anyway.”

Then it dawned on me: We don’t have to spend any time with those people. We’re prima-donna-free!


Dale Vaillancourt lives in Burnsville.

  • related content

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters