Two reports reflect a growing gap in global free press standards and practices.
Inequality is a growing global concern. But it’s not just income: Information inequality, in the form of a free press, increasingly separates societies, too.
Two reports released this week — “World Press Freedom Index 2014,” from Reporters Without Borders, and “Attacks on the Press: Journalism on the Front Lines 2013,” from the Committee to Protect Journalists — reveal the growing gaps in free press protections.
Reporters Without Borders’ press-freedom index ranked 180 nations, and again found that the highly developed democracies of Western Europe were the world’s free-press epicenter. Conversely, a press-repression crescent of the world’s worst offenders stretched from Southeast Asia to Central Asia to sub-Saharan Africa. While each nation’s experience is unique, four major trends were identified in the report. The first — press repression related to armed conflict — is not new. But the intensity seems to be, especially in Syria (no. 177 on the list), the world’s most dangerous place for journalists. And like the vicious civil war, crackdowns on media freedoms know no borders. Neighboring nations like Lebanon (106) fell four spots from last year’s study, and the sectarian nature of the conflict spurred Jordan (153rd, -2) to constrict media freedoms, too.
In Africa, the violent spirals in Somalia (176, unchanged from last year), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (151st, -8), Mali (122, -22) and the Central African Republic (109th, -34) eroded already-scant press freedoms.
Beyond state-sponsored repression, nonstate actors like Libyan militias have privatized press repression, too. Most notably, post-coup Egypt (159) has picked up where former President Hosni Mubarak — and the Muslim Brotherhood — left off: harassing the media. In January, 20 Al Jazeera journalists were charged by the military-led government. The State Department has appropriately protested, but this should be a bigger priority for President Obama, especially considering the billions in U.S. aid sent over the years.
Within this crescent is China (175th, -1), which stands as an example of another troubling trend: regional models in decline. The size and scope of nations like Russia (148th, +1) impact neighboring nations, which are all too often keen on replicating the repression.
Another trend stems from freedom of information “that is too often sacrificed to an overly broad and abusive interpretation of national security needs, making a disturbing retreat from democratic processes,” the report stated. In fact, this is the trend of the year, according to Delphine Halgand, U.S. director for Reporters Without Borders. Turkey (154), for one, uses the rubric of the war on terror to target the press. Just this week, a photo of a TV reporter targeted by a police water cannon went viral, sparking outrage.
National security is the main reason that the United States suffered a dizzying drop of 13 points to 46th — right below Romania and above Haiti. The lower ranking is “really a serious, significant decline for a democracy,” said Halgand. And of course, the United States isn’t just any democracy.
“It’s a global model,” Halgand added. “If the U.S. is not the best example of protection of information, protection of the press, protection of privacy, protection of the Internet, then all other authoritarian regimes will have any excuse to do whatever they want.”
And they seem to be doing just that, said Joel Simon, executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists. “The spike in journalists imprisoned shot up after 2001, because when the Bush administration started using anti-terror framework, that was very convenient to repressive governments around the world,” he said. “Anything that happens in this country has an impact globally and resonates beyond our borders.”
Meanwhile, the borderless Internet may see new boundaries after global outrage over National Security Agency surveillance. China, as well as other nations, has proposed a new Internet infrastructure framework that isn’t so closely associated with the United States. Simon predicted the change would be “absolutely terrible.”
The high- and low-tech attacks on the press occur in a “complex and contradictory” environment, he said.
“Yes, we live in a world … in which information is more accessible to people than ever before. There is a perception that technology has utterly transformed the way that news and information [are] gathered and disseminated around the world, and that’s true,” Simon said. “And yet the leading indicators of press freedom — journalists killed and in prison — are bad and getting worse. And we are seeing increasing restrictions on the Internet itself as governments around the world become more sophisticated about using this technology for their own purposes.”
Simon said this is a period of both great promise and peril. “The future will be determined by the battles that we wage today. There is a tremendous amount at stake, and the outcome is in no way predetermined,” he said.
If so, U.S. leaders should make choices that put America at the top of 2014’s Press Freedom index. It’s not just journalism that’s at stake. America’s foreign policy, tech industry and status as a global example are at risk, too.
John Rash is a Star Tribune editorial writer and columnist. The Rash Report can be heard at 8:20 a.m. Fridays on WCCO Radio, 830-AM. On Twitter: @rashreport.
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.