Why no bankers went to jail: It's the revolving door, stupid

  • Article by: WILLIAM D. COHAN , Bloomberg News
  • Updated: January 22, 2014 - 6:12 PM

For government watchdogs, there’s the lure of lucrative jobs just beyond the revolving door.


Photo: Paul Lachine • NewsArt,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger


One of the most disturbing realities of the 2008 financial crisis is that no Wall Street executives have been held accountable. After searching more than five years for the reason some people have gotten away with the financial equivalent of murder, I think I have finally figured it out:

It’s the revolving door, stupid.

The chance for senior government officials to make millions after their public service ends convinces them — subliminally or not — to pull their punches. No doubt that’s why Jimmy Cayne, the former chief executive officer of Bear Stearns & Co., continues to enjoy playing bridge and golf, his $400 million-plus fortune, his sprawling mansion in Elberon, N.J., and his duplex at the Plaza Hotel.

It also explains why Dick Fuld, former CEO of Lehman Brothers Holdings, was able to form Matrix Advisors to consult on mergers and acquisitions, even though he had been a trader, not an M&A banker. Even if the firm has no clients, it doesn’t much matter: Fuld testified before Congress that his 2000-2007 Lehman compensation was about $310 million. He later conceded it could have been $350 million. The real number is closer to $520 million, according to people who prepared and studied Lehman’s public filings.

When Stan O’Neal resigned from Merrill Lynch in 2007, less than a year before it almost went bankrupt, he was given a parting gift of $161.5 million and a board seat — which he still holds — at Alcoa.

The roster of executives being rewarded for bad behavior goes on and on.

Why have prosecutors allowed Wall Street executives to slither away into the 1 percent — or one-tenth of 1 percent — without paying a financial penalty or serving time? After all, as the Financial Times reported, about 3,500 bank executives went to jail after the 1980s savings-and-loan crisis, which wasn’t nearly as devastating as the 2008 debacle.

Not a single bank executive is wearing an orange jumpsuit today. “The Justice Department failed,” former New York Gov. and Attorney General Eliot Spitzer told “Frontline” a year ago. “They didn’t ever try to bring together one coherent narrative, laying out the entirety of the story against one of the major players and demand sanctions that are meaningful.”

Not even the oleaginous Angelo Mozilo — the former Countrywide Financial Corp. CEO who walked off center stage with a net worth of about $600 million — has spent time in jail for creating and selling billions of dollars’ worth of squirrelly home mortgages that found their way into the securities that Wall Street sold to investors.

The lone civil case that occasioned a victory lap for the Securities and Exchange Commission was against Fabrice Tourre, the former Goldman Sachs vice president who was guilty of nothing more than following orders as a foot soldier in the Wall Street army. Tourre is appealing his 2013 conviction in this ridiculous case; I hope he wins.

In 2011, as part of a profile I wrote about him in Fortune, Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, explained why he hadn’t prosecuted any Wall Street executives. He supplied the usual pabulum about how he wanted nothing more than to bring such cases, but that piles of subpoenaed documents revealed no evidence of prosecutable wrongdoing.

If that’s true, Bharara should release the evidence publicly so that the American people can see what he has seen.

Why do I blame the revolving door between law enforcement and the private sector for the lack of justice? Consider Lanny Breuer, the former criminal division head at the U.S. Department of Justice. He told the New York Bar Association that worries “literally keep me up at night” that innocent workers and markets might suffer if he indicted Wall Street firms. Breuer left government last year to return to his partnership at the Covington & Burling law firm, where he is paid millions of dollars a year.

You don’t have to be a genius to figure out how this game works.

When Robert Khuzami, the former head of enforcement at the SEC and a former general counsel of Deutsche Bank in the Americas, leaves government for a $5-million-a-year job as a partner at Kirkland & Ellis, you can see what’s going on.

When Tim Geithner, the former Treasury secretary, takes over as president of Warburg Pincus, the private-equity firm, even a high-school dropout can discern a pattern.

When the general counsels at JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America Corp. and Deutsche Bank — Stephen Cutler, Gary Lynch and Richard Walker, respectively — previously had been directors of enforcement at the SEC, the picture becomes perfectly clear.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters