'Death panel' lies killed a good public policy

  • Article by: LOS ANGELES TIMES EDITORIAL
  • Updated: August 1, 2013 - 7:37 PM
hide

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin

Photo: Cheryl Senter, Associated Press/NYT

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview largerrr

Among the most egregious distortions to cloud the health care debate in 2009 was the false notion that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act called for “death panels,” through which the government would determine whether seniors and the disabled should receive care. So dishonest was this characterization, popularized by Alaska’s then-Gov. Sarah Palin, that PolitiFact named it the “Lie of the Year.”

In truth, one of the provisions of the act that gave rise to Palin’s critique would have done just the opposite: help patients make their own decisions about their treatment at the end of life. But it was removed from the bill in the heat of the death panel rhetoric. Now it is back as part of HR 1173, introduced by Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., with 17 bipartisan co-sponsors.

The bill requires that Medicare and Medicaid cover the cost of voluntary end-of-life consultations every five years and more often if there is a significant change in health status. Conversations about treatment decisions in the final stages of life take time, so it’s important that insurers cover one-on-one consultations with physicians. By offering coverage more than once, the proposal recognizes that advanced care preferences change depending on age and health. At its core, the bill affords individuals greater choice in what are often the most sensitive decisions a person will make in his or her lifetime.

Currently, many patients speak informally to their doctors about advance-care planning and some are encouraged to fill out an advance directive. But Medicare, Medicaid and most private insurers typically don’t cover consultations specifically for these discussions. Some experts believe that if Medicare and Medicaid were required to cover advance-care consultations, insurance companies would follow suit.

According to a 2011 survey from the Regence Foundation and the National Journal, 81 percent of Americans agreed that advance-care discussions should be covered by Medicare. Blumenauer’s proposal is smart policy now, as it was in 2009. Americans are ready to talk about death. Our politicians should be ready also.

 

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close