Minnesota doesn't need an expensive private-school choice program that benefits relatively few.
When even an advocate of private-school choice has to admit there is no convincing evidence that vouchers produce better student achievement ("Minnesota falls behind on school choice," Jan. 28) it raises the question: How is Minnesota missing the boat?
In fact, the preponderance of impartial research shows that vouchers are not a good deal for students or taxpayers. Meanwhile, Minnesota has been recognized for its array of public-school choices. Our state has wisely chosen not to divert scarce tax dollars to private schools, but to invest in public-school programs open to all.
This year, many of our state's leaders have come to recognize that early learning is the best investment we can make. Gov. Mark Dayton and a number of lawmakers are promoting an expansion of all-day kindergarten and preschool programs.
Education Minnesota strongly supports free all-day kindergarten for every Minnesota child, with additional investment in pre-K programs as money becomes available.
Early childhood programs have high rates of return on investment, but they are not cheap. Dayton's $130 million kindergarten and early childhood budget only begins to cover the cost. Wisconsin's voucher program cost $150 million last year, and lawmakers want to expand it.
Such expenditures in Minnesota would make it that much harder to fund the expansion of all-day kindergarten, early childhood and other public-school programs that actually improve academic achievement.
Most of Minnesota's students are, and will continue to be, in public K-12 schools. Minnesota doesn't need an expensive private-school choice program that benefits relatively few.
Tom Dooher is president of Education Minnesota, a union of 70,000 Minnesota educators.
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.