A U.S. 'reset' with Israel?

Article by: EDITORIAL , Washington Post
Updated: October 16, 2012 - 11:00 AM

Though the Obama administration has worked closely with Israel in many areas, the president and Netanyahu have made a mess of their personal relationship.

hide

Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney meets with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in Jerusalem, Sunday, July 29, 2012.

Photo: Charles Dharapak, Associated Press

Camera Star Tribune photo galleries

Camera view larger

19
comments
resize text
print
buy reprints

Tweet
share

email
Email share

your name

your email

recipients email

+ add a comment add a comment

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to call elections means that in January, as in 2009, a U.S. president will be inaugurated shortly ahead of a new Israeli government. Most likely that government will again be headed by Netanyahu, who starts his campaign with a commanding lead in the polls. The question will be whether President Obama or Mitt Romney will be able to use the fresh mandates in Washington and Jerusalem to launch a badly needed "reset" in U.S.-Israeli relations.

Though the Obama administration has worked closely with Israel in many areas, the president and Netanyahu have made a mess of their personal relationship. Obama sought to publicly distance himself from Israel early in his term, and he erred in centering his push for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations on a secondary issue - Israeli settlement-building in the West Bank and Jerusalem. He has never visited Israel. Netanyahu, for his part, publicly lectured Obama during his last White House visit, openly pressured Obama last month to set "red lines" on Iran's nuclear program and made it relatively clear that he would welcome Romney's election.

Netanyahu's poor relations with Washington could cost him votes, particularly if Ehud Olmert, a centrist former prime minister, enters the race. But the incumbent will present himself to security-conscious Israelis as the best qualified to confront Iran. In a speech to the United Nations last month, Netanyahu suggested that Iran's uranium processing could reach a critical point and invite a military strike by Israel by next spring or summer. If he wins the election, he might feel freer to ignore U.S. objections to such unilateral action, as well as those of Israel's security establishment.

Romney has promised to eliminate the "daylight" between the U.S. and Israeli governments. But he, no less than Obama, will have to find a way to agree with Israel on a strategy for Iran that keeps with U.S., as well as Israeli, interests. Last week Romney told CNN's Wolf Blitzer that he shared Netanyahu's view that Iran should not be allowed to obtain the "capacity" to build a nuclear weapon - a stricter stance than Obama's vow to prevent Tehran from building a bomb. But Romney added that "we have a long way to go before military action may be necessary" - a judgment that is closer to Obama's than to the Israeli leader's.

Neither Obama nor Romney is likely to succeed in policy toward Iran, not to mention their shared goal of creating a Palestinian state, unless they can forge a trusting relationship with Israel's leader. Obama may hope that Netanyahu is unseated; perhaps Romney secretly shares that wish. But chances are that one of them will have to find a better way to do business with this prickly Israeli leader over the next four years than Obama has in his first term.

more from commentaries
Counterpoint: Home care workers in Minnesota deserve a union vote
IRS controversy illuminates a larger flaw
Minnesota Legislature: Well, there's always 2014

get related content delivered to your inbox

manage my email subscriptions

19
comments
resize text
print
buy reprints

Tweet
share

email
Email share

your name

your email

recipients email

+ add a comment add a comment

about opinion
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.
Submit a letter or commentary
Sign up for the Opinion newsletter