Why politicians get away with lies

  • Article by: MELINDA HENNEBERGER , Washington Post
  • Updated: March 23, 2012 - 7:45 PM
hide

Guest editorial cartoon for March 3, 2012. Topic: GOP presidential primaries.

Photo: Walt Handelsman, Tribune Media Services

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Newspapers hardly ever haul off and say a public figure lied, and I like that about us; if you feel you don't hear that word enough, please tell me where you live and what the housing market's like.

But we do point out misstatements, and the public doesn't often care.

Only rarely is a politician made to pay full fare for even the most full-blown flight from reality. Instead, we punish those moments when we're made to hear the truth.

From Mitt Romney's insistence that President Obama travels the planet apologizing to Newt Gingrich's pledge to make gasoline sell for $2.50 a gallon, candidates often get applauded for rhetoric run amok.

My nominee for the most over-the-top tale of the primary so far is Rick Santorum's dark fantasy about forced euthanasia in the Netherlands — where, in his telling, fearful grandparents accessorize with "do not euthanize me" bracelets and slink around hoping they never have to be hospitalized.

The Dutch, never having heard of such, dispatched a TV reporter to ask the candidate what he was talking about. To which Santorum's spokeswoman, Alice Stewart, did respond truthfully: "A lot of these things," she said, "it's a matter of what's in his heart."

(In my heart, I'm 24 and an heiress, as God intended; so what?)

Even falsehoods can be illuminating, of course, as when Santorum rationalized that Republicans who don't vote for him must be less than serious about their religious faith.

But endlessly describing health-care reform as the end of life as we know it doesn't make it true.

(Is it better or worse that Santorum at least seems to believe his mistaken but from-the-heart claims that under "Obamacare," his daughter with Trisomy 18 would not have received the same care? While Romney, who says that we're "only inches away from no longer being a free economy," used to know better.)

Either way, candidates would surely try harder to get it right if they weren't rewarded for getting it wrong. And regularly made to regret those occasions when the truth does trickle out.

When Jon Huntsman acknowledged some unastonishing facts about climate change, for instance, that was a permanent conversation stopper. And Nancy Pelosi is still taking heat for saying in frustration what's true of every piece of legislation — that we only find out every last implication of its passage after it becomes law.

A generation ago, George H.W. Bush expressed his terrible truth without saying a word. When he stole a glance at his watch while debating Bill Clinton, it was as clear a cry for help as if he'd shouted, "Dear Lord, how long?"

Walter Mondale doomed his 1984 presidential chances by admitting that the winner of the race would have to raise taxes — which is exactly what the winner, Ronald Reagan, did.

The current Republican front-runner's father, George Romney, blew his shot at the presidency during his 1968 campaign when he told an interviewer that after actually visiting Vietnam, he'd started to see that he'd been "brainwashed" by our military.

Sometimes a little taste of hard truth doesn't matter too much — as when Mitt Romney remarked in a debate that he sure was worried about employing undocumented workers because, as he'd told the guy who hired other guys to mow his lawn, "I'm running for office, for Pete's sake."

Or when, at a campaign event in Maryland on Wednesday, a businessman in the crowd told him, "I haven't failed yet," and Romney replied that it was still early. "You will" fail, Romney cheerfully assured the man, adding that "it's in the nature of the private sector."

(Again, true — but also something that, if uttered by Obama, would have been seen as proof positive of his contempt for capitalism.)

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close