Prop 8 ruling reaffirms Obama's stance

  • Article by: GREG SARGENT , Washington Post
  • Updated: February 8, 2012 - 1:18 PM

The narrow ruling is in keeping with the president, who says his views on same-sex marriage are evolving.

hide

Gay Marriage

Photo: Dean Rohrer, NewsArt

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

In a big win for gay rights and common decency, a federal appeals court has pronounced California's Proposition 8 unconstitutional, arguing that there's no "legitimate reason for the passage of a law that treats different classes of people differently."

This was the money quote in the ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: "Proposition 8 serves no purpose, and has no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California, and to officially reclassify their relationships and families as inferior to those of opposite-sex couples."

Further, the court shot down the reprehensible effort by Prop. 8 supporters to argue that the judge on the case was biased because he is gay, ruling that there was no evidence of bias.

Here's an interesting angle on the decision: Gay rights advocates are hoping that this increases pressure on President Obama to unequivocally declare his support for gay marriage. He has said his position on it is "evolving."

But one expert I spoke to points out that in fact, Obama has caught a pretty big break on this topic. That's because the court's ruling was narrow, and in effect actually affirms Obama's position.

According to Richard Socarides, a prominent gay rights advocate, the key to the ruling is that it didn't pronounce gay marriage a right under the U.S. Constitution. That broader ruling is what advocates had hoped for — and Obama would have been expected to declare agreement with it.

Rather, Socarides noted, the court simply affirmed that you can't take away by referendum a right to marry that citizens already enjoy under state law. And this is consistent with Obama's position on Prop. 8.

"We were hoping for a very broad ruling that held that there was a right under the Constitution to same-sex marriage," Socarides told me. "If the court had ruled on those grounds, there would have been more pressure for him to move forward with his evolution on this.

"The decision . . . is fully consistent with the president's previously stated position that states should not take away rights by initiative," Socarides continued.

"He can continue to say, 'My views are evolving but I completely agree that states should not take away rights by initiative.' On this decision, he caught a break. Whether he will be able to continue avoiding the issue is still to be determined."

Socarides says he doesn't expect the decision to come before the Supreme Court this year.
Obama has done a great deal for the cause of gay rights, and he has left the clear impression that he fully supports gay marriage, even if he has not been willing to say so out loud.

But even if today's decision doesn't put more pressure on him to go further, Obama can point to it to reaffirm, with real conviction, his oft-stated position that the arc of history is long but it bends towards justice.
 

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close