The miserable 5 percent turnout in Tuesday's primary election in St. Paul nicely helps advocates of instant runoff voting in city elections make their case. Low-visibiity city primary elections often produce turnout so low that they cannot be claimed to produce results that reliably reflect majority opinion.
St. Paul voters will be asked on Nov. 3 whether they want to follow the lead of Minneapolis, scrap their primary and conduct a single election using the ranked-choice method that instant runoff voting allows. If the Nov. 3 voters who stayed away from the polls on Tuesday did so out of a sense that primaries ought to be obsolete, instant runoff voting looks like a shoe-in in St. Paul.
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More from Star Tribune
More From Star Tribune
More From Opinion
the Editorial Board of the Los Angeles Times
Protect kids online
Efforts underway in a number of states to protect young users of social media deserve support.
Opinion
Becka Thompson
Here's how I'd broadly frame the environment that led to my firing as a teacher
Children deserve our best, and we are not giving it.
Annette Meeks
Get rid of Minnesota's precinct caucuses, go to primary elections up and down the ballot
What is perceived as a grassroots engagement of average citizens actually isn't in practice.
Letters
Readers Write: Smoking in Minneapolis, phones in schools, Trump's trial, theater, film
Push this tobacco ordinance forward.