Looks like they've got our number

Jerry Holt, Star Tribune

All eyes were focused on a ballot held up by Minneapolis Election Judge Marge Dolan on Wednesday. She was surrounded, from left, by fellow Judge Julia Nelson, Franken monitor Zev Aelony and Coleman monitors Alan Shilepsky and Nancy Bernard. The recount in the U.S. Senate race was held in a warehouse in northeast Minneapolis.

By Scott Gillespie

Last update: November 21, 2008 - 9:13 AM

Here’s a prediction: Al Franken will win the Senate recount.

Here’s a second prediction: A good percentage of Americans will end up believing that the election was stolen from Sen. Norm Coleman.

Why will Franken come out on top? Let’s count the ways. Minnesota law requires election judges to consider voter intent. If, for example, a voter circles a candidate’s name instead of properly filling in a circle next to the name, an optical scanner might not have counted the vote on Election Night. However, in the hand recount, if the intent of the voter is clear, the vote will be counted.

So shouldn’t Coleman get just as many of those votes? Probably not. Low-income voters, immigrants with little voting experience and the elderly are known to make more mistakes marking ballots. Those groups happen to lean toward Democratic candidates. It’s a good bet that Franken will pick up the votes he needs simply because "intent’’ will work in his favor.

Dartmouth College Prof. Michael C. Herron, who has studied the Senate results, told the Huffington Post’s Sam Stein that of the 2.9 million votes cast in Minnesota, 34,000 did not have a recorded vote for Senate. Herron told Stein that a good portion of those were voters who intentionally didn’t vote in the race, but at least some — Stein estimates 8,000 to 10,000 — probably did intend to vote for one of the candidates and simply screwed up in marking their ballots. Based on where the ballots were cast and other factors, Herron bets Franken will win the recount.

So let’s suppose Franken wins. Why will a significant number of Americans believe the redo was rigged?

Because the stolen-election drumbeat has started, and it will only get louder as the results of the recount get more national attention. Ignoring Minnesota law, talk-show hosts are already questioning why any ballot that’s not marked properly in the first place should be valid in a recount. Intent is a concept they would rather not grasp.

Rep. Michele Bachmann, bringing her unique view of reality to Fox News on Wednesday night, said Franken "wants to stuff the ballot box with rejected ballots,’’ which "calls into question what the record is and who’s watching the books.’’ (The video is available, so we know she said it. Or was that another "urban legend’’ talking with Sean Hannity?)

Recent Opinion Exchange stories

Kristofer Layon: Left-handed marriage: A slippery slope - November 21, 2008

Kristofer Layon: Left-handed marriage: A slippery slope - Your own right-handed marriage may still thrive. But society will not. More

Comment on this story | Read all 15 comments | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS