A campaign that changed campaigns

By DAVID KREJCI

Last update: November 4, 2008 - 6:05 PM

Darwin would have predicted last night’s election this way: "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change."

And we’re not talking about a change from the Bush administration in this case. My world isn’t politics, it’s communications: marketing, public relations and advertising (or the blurry mess the three have become in today’s social media soup). Barack Obama adapted to changes in culture and communications to redefine how word is spread and, specifically, how campaigns are run.

And, if ever the medium were the message, so it is here. By embracing the full-scale cultural shift in how people interact with each other, how companies interact with consumers and how institutions interact with constituencies, and how the world interacts with itself, Obama has shown himself as the very embodiment of change.

Oh, come on, cry many voices from the back pew. Enough of the techno babble. Facebook-this, tweeter-that. If you dare use the word blog, I’ll immediately place this paper at the bottom of the bird cage.

cry many voices from the back pew. blog,

It may be precisely that perspective that made Obama so successful. The idea that social media are a fad is a mistake far too many marketers continue to make, second only to the notion that social media are "a techie or a youth thing."

Obama’s camp made neither of these mistakes. It understood that humans are — and have always been — social creatures, and that social media are nothing more than a powerful accelerant to human interaction. To suggest that they are new is akin to suggesting that chewing our food is a modern concept or that the love of warmth is a fad activated by the discovery of fire. Social media are the continuation of our species’ drive to connect, communicate and collaborate. Obama embraced this reality and, with it, propelled a network of mobilized, purposeful advocates the likes of which no marketing effort has ever seen.

Recent Opinion Exchange stories

Ruth Marcus: 'I bet he wasn't folding laundry' - November 4, 2008

Ruth Marcus: 'I bet he wasn't folding laundry' - CAROL GREIDER, WINNER OF THE 2009 NOBEL PRIZE IN MEDICINE, ON WHAT SHE WAS DOING AT 5 A.M. WHEN THE BIG CALL CAME, AND HER THOUGHTS ON LEARNING OF PRESIDENT OBAMA'S NOBEL PEACE PRIZE. More

Comment on this story | Read all 1 comments | Hide reader comments

New ideas for the public sector

THERE'S NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME to create a more efficient Minnesota. Facing large budget deficits at the state, county and local levels, Minnesotans are seeing with new clarity that the public sector must adapt to new economic realities. Only the smartest, most strategic reinvention will ensure that our tax dollars are spent on the best programs and services. Read more

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS