Unappealing labels help cut smoking rates in Australia

  • Article by: EDITORIAL , Washington Post
  • Updated: July 23, 2014 - 6:20 PM

Ban on enticing logos is worth copying in the United States.

In this computer-generated image provided by the Minister for Health and Ageing of Australia in 2011 when the rules were under consideration, proposed cigarette packaging was stripped of all logos and replaced with graphic images.

To buy cigarettes in Australia, you have to pick up a dull green package plastered with photos of a shriveled infant, a blackened lung or an old man with a tracheotomy hole in his throat. You also need to look closely because the only difference among brands is the name in a small, prescribed font on the bottom quarter of the pack. This arrangement, implemented in 2012, made Australia the first nation both to require graphic images and to ban enticing logos on cigarette packs.

On Thursday, Australian officials announced that the nation’s smoking rate fell 15 percent in the past three years — from 15.1 percent of people older than 14 in 2010 to 12.8 percent in 2013.

“This means the daily smoking rate has halved since 1991,” said Geoff Neideck, a health spokesman. By comparison, the United States took nearly a half-century to do the same.

Australia’s path toward the plain-packaging law wasn’t smooth. A long public debate preceded passage of the measure. Philip Morris and other tobacco companies then challenged it in court and before a United Nations tribunal, and they covered some legal fees for several countries to dispute it at the World Trade Organization. The government won the domestic lawsuit, but the other two cases are still pending.

Tobacco researchers say that the drop in the smoking rate shows that plain-packaging laws — as well as the 25 percent tax increase Australia instituted in 2010 — work. These packs help “de-normalize” smoking, disassociating it from hipness and associating it with smoking’s health consequences.

Perhaps the fact that cigarette manufacturers are filing lawsuits is evidence enough of the laws’ impact — and a sign that the United States should be following in Australia’s footsteps.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Will the Gophers bring home The Axe?

Weekly Question
 
Close