That's where laws are made and can readily be refined, unlike with the Constitution.
Just vote "no" to the proposed amendments.
There are too many costs, too many questions. It needs more work.
Proponents can't explain away the trouble it would cause.
It's an unnecessary and costly amendment.
On Nov. 6, Minnesotans from all corners of the state will go to the polls to choose who will represent them over the next two to six years. This includes choosing the next president, a U.S. senator, members of Congress and state legislators.
Sure, there are benefits, but the current voting ease is important
The voter ID crusade is nothing but an organized attempt to steal an election by patting down any voter who doesn't look or feel like a likely Republican vote.
Let's make technical electoral changes in the Legislature, not the Constitution.
The experience of a century ago may offer a cautionary lesson about today's changes in election laws.
Former Secretary of State Joan Growe is fed up with what she sees as misleading claims.
The young -- and therefore the Democrats -- should be very worried.
Let's hear what two of Minnesota's prominent faith-based social service agencies have to say:
A 1919 Minnesota law says, 'The secretary of state shall provide an appropriate title' for every question on the ballot.
The voter ID constitutional amendment is a costly (and partisan) fix for a problem we don't have.
Its demise would be a likely practical effect of the voter ID requirement.
It's important to remember the price that was paid to win the right to vote.
Don't enshrine major election change in state Constitution.
Experience demonstrates the wisdom of governing as our founders intended.
Minnesota has one of the cleanest systems of voting in the nation.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT