Election 2012 commentary: In favor of the proposed Marriage Amendment

  • By: STAR TRIBUNE STAFF
  • Updated: September 13, 2012 - 11:58 PM

Campaign Finance Board oversteps its authority

By JOHN HELMBERGER October 13, 2011, 06:46 PM

Its ruling on marriage-amendment donors would expose individuals for an organization's action.

36 Comments

Amendment donors should stay private

By PETER J. NELSON October 10, 2011, 06:19 PM

An Oct. 6 editorial praised the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board's recent opinion requiring the disclosure of the source of certain donations to support or defeat ballot questions ("Voters should know amendment donors").

51 Comments

Gay marriage supporters opt to intimidate

By KATHERINE KERSTEN May 21, 2011, 08:36 PM

That's why they trot out words like 'bigotry' and generally distort the issue.

197 Comments

Oh, so when it's marriage, they object

By JASON LEWIS May 14, 2011, 08:38 PM

Look, this wouldn't be the state's first recent constitutional question, but there's reason to believe that it might be one of the more necessary ones.

177 Comments

Marriage Amendment: It might mean Constitution is amended, as intended

By GREG WERSAL May 11, 2011, 10:04 PM

A possible solution to our constitutional debate over gay marriage can be found in Minnesota's constitutional history.

14 Comments

Traditional marriage is not bigotry

By JEFF DAVIS May 09, 2011, 08:23 PM

It's outlandish to call same-sex marriage a 'civil right.'

85 Comments

Result Per Page

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Should Roger Goodell lose his job as NFL commissioner over Rice case?

Weekly Question
 
Close