Its ruling on marriage-amendment donors would expose individuals for an organization's action.
An Oct. 6 editorial praised the Minnesota Campaign Finance Board's recent opinion requiring the disclosure of the source of certain donations to support or defeat ballot questions ("Voters should know amendment donors").
That's why they trot out words like 'bigotry' and generally distort the issue.
Look, this wouldn't be the state's first recent constitutional question, but there's reason to believe that it might be one of the more necessary ones.
A possible solution to our constitutional debate over gay marriage can be found in Minnesota's constitutional history.
It's outlandish to call same-sex marriage a 'civil right.'
ADVERTISEMENT
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT