NAME: California Voting Rights Act
WHAT IT DOES: The 2002 law is intended to promote the election of more people of color in local races. It amounts to an attack on "at-large" elections — those in which candidates run citywide or within an entire school district — that some say can be biased against minorities.
HOW IT DOES IT: The U.S. Supreme Court established several conditions in 1986 that lawyers must meet to prove an election system is watering down the voting strength of minorities. The California law eliminates one of the federal requirements. The result: voting-rights violations under the California act are easier to prove, allowing at-large elections to be replaced by elections in smaller districts.
THE CRITICISM: Some critics say the law is unconstitutional, claiming it makes race a predominant factor in elections. Also, unlike the federal scheme, lawyers do not have to show that the minority voters live in a compact enough area to create a smaller district in which a candidate from that group could win. But if lawyers can't create a district in which a minority candidate could win, than what is the point of breaking up an at-large districts?
See thousands of photos from other StarTribune.com readers and share your own photos and video today.
![]() Find Your Next HomeSearch realtor represented & for sale by owner homes in the Twin Cities. Plus, find open house listings. |
Win tickets to the North Star Roller Girls' second bout at the Minneapolis Convention Center.Vita.mn presents the North Star Roller Girls' second bout at the Minneapolis Convention Center on Dec. 5. |
Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments