StarTribune.com
health110809.box

Home | Nation

What's in the house democrats' bill

Last update: November 7, 2009 - 11:31 PM

what's in the house democrats' bill

WHO'S COVERED: About 96 percent of legal residents younger than 65 -- compared with 83 percent now. About one-third of the remaining 18 million people younger than 65 left uninsured would be illegal immigrants.

COST: The Congressional Budget Office says the bill's cost of expanding insurance coverage over 10 years is $1.055 trillion. The net cost is $894 billion, factoring in penalties on individuals and employers who don't comply with new requirements. That's less than President Obama's $900 billion goal. However, those figures leave out a variety of new costs in the bill including increased prescription drug coverage for seniors under Medicare, so the measure may be around $1.2 trillion.

HOW IT'S PAID FOR: $460 billion over the next decade from new income taxes on single people making more than $500,000 a year and couples making more than $1 million. There are also more than $400 billion in cuts to Medicare and Medicaid; a new $20 billion fee on medical devicemakers; $13 billion from limiting contributions to flexible spending accounts; sizable penalties paid by individuals and employers who don't obtain coverage; and a mix of other corporate taxes and fees.

REQUIREMENTS FOR INDIVIDUALS: People must have insurance, enforced through a tax penalty of 2.5 percent of income. They can apply for hardship waivers if coverage is unaffordable.

REQUIREMENTS FOR EMPLOYERS: They must provide insurance to their employees or pay a penalty of 8 percent of payroll. Companies with payrolls less than $500,000 annually are exempt and the penalty is phased in for companies with payrolls from $500,000 to $750,000. Small businesses -- those with 10 or fewer workers -- get tax credits to help them provide coverage.

SUBSIDIES: Individuals and families with annual income up to 400 percent of poverty level, or $88,000 for a family of four, would get sliding-scale subsidies to help them buy coverage. The subsidies would begin in 2013.

HOW YOU CHOOSE YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE: Beginning in 2013 through a new Health Insurance Exchange open to individuals and, initially, small employers; it could be expanded to large employers over time. States could opt to operate their own exchanges in place of the national exchange if they follow federal rules.

BENEFITS PACKAGE: A committee would recommend a so-called essential benefits package including preventive services; out-of pocket costs would be capped. The new benefit package would be the basic benefit package offered in the exchange.

INSURANCE INDUSTRY RESTRICTIONS: No denial of coverage based on preexisting conditions. No higher premiums allowed for preexisting conditions or gender. Limits on higher premiums based on age.

GOVERNMENT-RUN PLAN: A new public plan available through the insurance exchanges would be set up and run by the secretary of Health and Human Services. The HHS secretary will negotiate rates with providers.

CHANGES TO MEDICAID: The federal-state insurance program for the poor would be expanded to cover all individuals younger than 65 with incomes up to 150 percent of the federal poverty level, which is $33,075 per year for a family of four. The federal government would pick up the full cost of the expansion in 2013 and 2014; thereafter the federal government would pay 91 percent and states would pay 9 percent.

DRUGS: Grants 12 years of market protection to high-tech drugs used to combat cancer, Parkinson's and other deadly diseases. Phases out the gap in Medicare prescription drug coverage by 2019. Requires the HHS secretary to negotiate drug prices on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries.

ANTITRUST: Would strip the health insurance industry of a long-standing exemption from antitrust laws covering market allocation, price fixing and bid rigging. Gives the Federal Trade Commission authority to look into the health insurance industry at its own initiative.

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Recent Nation stories

Wyoming files new lawsuit challenging Yellowstone snowmobile rules - November 7, 2009
Wyoming files new lawsuit challenging Yellowstone snowmobile rules - The state of Wyoming filed a federal lawsuit Friday seeking to block the National Park Service from further restricting snowmobile numbers in Yellowstone National Park. More

Comment on this story   |   Be the first to comment   |  Hide reader comments

Subscribe
Your Photos and Video

Share photos and videos now

Golf

What a game! Nothing like sweeping the Packers with Brett.

See thousands of photos from other StarTribune.com readers and share your own photos and video today.

Shopping + Classifieds
Personal Recruiter

No resume? No problem!

Create a skills profile in minutes, let a recruiter match you to an open position. Click here to get started.
Find A Job

Open positions!

A new career awaits. Look through thousands of listings to find your new job. Start now!

Win tickets to the Dec. 3 performance of "In The Heights" at Orpheum Theatre.

Vita.mn presents the Dec. 3 performance of "In The Heights" at Orpheum Theatre, and is hosting the official cast after party at First Avenue's Ritmo Caliente.

See all contests