First Lady's plane aborts landing after controller error

  • Article by: ASHLEY HALSEY III , Washington Post
  • Updated: April 20, 2011 - 9:56 AM

It came too close to a military cargo jet, which can create dangerous turbulence in its wake, and had to circle the airport.

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A White House plane carrying Michelle Obama came dangerously close to a 200-ton military cargo jet and had to abort its landing at Joint Base Andrews on Monday as the result of an air traffic controller's mistake, according to federal officials familiar with the incident.

Controllers at Andrews feared the cargo jet would not clear the runway in time for Obama's plane to land, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak for their agencies.

Officials with the Federal Aviation Administration confirmed Tuesday that the First Lady was aboard the plane and said that "the aircraft were never in any danger." The White House referred all questions to the FAA.

The Federal Aviation Administration, already dealing with a series of controversies involving controllers sleeping and watching a movie on the job, sent a team of investigators Tuesday to the Warrenton, Va., radar control center, where the mistake was made.

The First Lady was returning from a television appearance and other events in New York, where she had appeared with Jill Biden. Obama was aboard a Boeing 737 that is part of the presidential fleet of jets when the error occurred on final approach to Andrews.

The controllers in the tower at Andrews recognized that the massive C-17 and the Obama flight, designated EXEC1F, a classification for a plane carrying members of the president's family, were far too close when the Warrenton controller handed off responsibility for the two aircraft.

They ordered the Obama plane to execute a series of S-turns in an effort to create a safe distance between it and the C-17, federal officials said. When those maneuvers failed to achieve the required distance between the two planes -- and the Andrews controllers realized the cargo jet would not have time to get off the runway before the presidential plane arrived -- they aborted landing of the Obama plane and ordered it to circle the airport.

Because an airplane's wake causes severe turbulence and, in extreme cases, can cause a plane that enters it to crash, the FAA has strict standards on how much distance controllers should maintain between planes.

A fully loaded C-17 can create such turbulence that the FAA requires a 5-mile separation behind it. The presidential fleet 737 was already far closer than that when the handoff took place from the Potomac Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) facility in Warrenton.

The TRACON controller exhibited "really bad controller technique," said a senior FAA manager familiar with the incident.

When the handoff occurred, the planes were 3.08 miles apart, radar shows, but the TRACON controller told the Andrews tower that they were 4 miles apart. Before handing off, the TRACON controller warned Obama's pilot of potential wake turbulence.

"In the grand scheme of things, events like this happen fairly frequently," said another federal official who works with the air traffic control system but is not authorized to speak publicly. "Unfortunately, this one involves a presidential plane."

Both go-arounds and errors by air traffic controllers are not uncommon. Controllers at Potomac TRACON, who direct more than 1.5 million flights a year to Washington-area airports, made a record 52 errors last year, an increase from 21 recorded in 2009.

In a memo to his staff last year, the facility's director cited "a definite increase in sloppy or poor adherence to SOP and handbook procedures."

Nationwide, recorded errors by controllers increased 51 percent last year, to 1,869.

In most instances, planes came too close but without risk of collision; in some, however, fatal consequences were narrowly averted.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close