The Minnesota Family Council might have exaggerated a touch in a mass email Tuesday with the following headline: "FCC set to drop ban on f-word, nudity on television and radio stations nationwide."

Yes, the Federal Communications Commission announced this month that it is re-examining its indecency policy for broadcast media in the wake of a September 2012 Supreme Court ruling. It is considering whether or not it should dole out penalties when isolated obscenities or unintended nudity (think Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction) hit the public airwaves. But it is not considering a hall pass for "Topless Survivor" or "The F-ing Big Bang Theory."

As a snopes article explains, the debate followed the High Court's ruling that the FCC was overreaching when it sanctioned FOX for unscripted obscenities that reached the airwaves during 2002 and 2003 broadcasts of the Billboard Music Awards shows. The FCC has since dropped numerous similar claims and turned its focus to the most "egregious" cases.

The policy review -- and the local MFC's warning about it -- have arrested the attention of Minnesota parents. There are, at the moment, 707 public comments posted on the FCC web site from Minnesotans on this issue. Many were submitted within the last 24 hours, and use wording recommending by the family council. Some are off-the-cuff reactions.

Most understand that the FCC is only considering relaxing standards on brief or unintended indecency. But they view such a change as the top of a slippery slope. Take the public comments of Diane Selz of Wyoming, Minn.:

Christy Holt of Coon Rapids said in her public comment that it is already tough enough to shield her kids from harm:

If you want your comments on the issue considered, use this link and enter proceeding #13.86 this month.