Fedwa Wazwaz

Fedwa Wazwaz is a Palestinian- American born in Jerusalem, Palestine and raised in the US. By profession, she is a senior data warehouse programmer with the University of Minnesota. Read more about Fedwa Wazwaz.

Conversation with Qays Arthur on Faith and Guidance 6d

Posted by: Fedwa Wazwaz Updated: May 13, 2013 - 6:32 AM
  • share

    email

“The hidden well-spring of your soul must needs rise and run murmuring to the sea; And the treasure of your infinite depths would be revealed to your eyes.”  --Khalil Gibran

 
 
This conversation is continuation to a series of conversations toward understanding Islam and Muslims. It is not a debating piece, but a reflective one. It is meant to clarify some of the confusion on Islamic beliefs. It is in response to the mocking question, freedom or submission, that is prevalent.  In this conversation we are addressing surrender or submission from the angle of self-knowledge. We discussed the importance of embracing our vulnerability, mortality, self-deception and here we will discuss briefly the embedded knowledge in the heart.
 
The beginning of this conversation is 6a, 6b and 6c. This conversation on surrender will focus in on a few verses of the Qur'an.  It is quite detailed and long and requires some thought and reflection. I will address civil questions at the end. The previous blogs on the Queen of Sheba are here: 5a and 5b.   
 
(Qur’an al-Waqia: 80-86)
“A Revelation from the Lord of the Worlds. Is it such a Message that ye would hold in light esteem? And have ye made it your livelihood that ye should declare it false? Then why do ye not (intervene) when (the soul of the dying man) reaches the throat,- And ye the while (sit) looking on,- But We are nearer to him than ye, and yet see not,- Then why do ye not,- If you are exempt from (future) account,- Call back the soul, if ye are true (in the claim of independence)?” 
 
(Qur’an Ta-Ha: 14-16)
"Verily, I am Allah: There is no god but I: So serve thou Me (only), and establish regular prayer for celebrating My praise. ”Verily the Hour is coming - My design is to keep it hidden - for every soul to receive its reward by the measure of its Endeavour. "Therefore let not such as believe not therein but follow their own lusts, divert thee therefrom, lest thou perish!"
 
Wazwaz:   In previous blogs, I started the discussion on faith and guidance by following the journey of Prophet Abraham, upon him be peace. It can be read here. He, upon him be peace, came to the junction point that he did not know.  Before he was guided, he was made to understand himself and his limited capabilities.  He used his mind, but God exposes his internal reality behind those questions:  “to satisfy the murmur in my heart.” 
 
There was an embedded question in the depths of his heart. He was searching for truth, for conviction, for certainty within the deep depths of his heart, not the deep depths of the world out there to prove someone is lying, to prove something he does not want to investigate is false.  In summary, he was using his mind, and not letting his mind use him to conjecture theories about a world beyond him guessing at the unknown.
 
Faith values reason and asks us to use our intelligence, aql.  The aql, or intelligence, is a gift from God.  However, faith asks people to be truth seekers, as what you seek and strive for internally influences what you receive and perceive in the world.  We must value science, but it is a means to discovering the world around us and not an end within itself.  It must also reconcile and be in harmony with the embedded knowledge of the heart. Each time a layer of darkness is removed from the heart, the knowledge embedded within is revealed to the eyes. 
 
According to Islamic tradition, one of the evidences that God will use to judge each and everyone one of us, is our hearts. No one will be dealt with unjustly.
 
“And that which is (locked up) in (human) breasts is made manifest. That their Lord had been Well-acquainted with them, (even to) that Day?” (Qur'an 100:10-11)
 
Shaykh Qays:  The story of Abraham, peace be upon him, is different from the story of the Queen of Sheba.  Like the Queen, Prophet Abraham, upon him be peace, is coming from a similar background, a world of idolatry.  However, he was a prophet. Prophets are protected from certain things prior to being chosen by God being manifested.  They are possessed of special intellects that are connected to their essential human nature (called fitra) and are illuminated by God’s special favor and grace. So Prophet Abraham knew to himself that worshipping things that people make in shops is wrong.  He knew that was morally reprehensible.
 
According to Islamic teachings, shirk or polytheism is about self-worship. Gnostics have said that monotheism (tawhid) is distinguishing the Eternal (God) from the transient (creation). When creation worships anything other than God, it is a form of self-worship - the transient worshiping the transient. It is manifested in Pharaoh (whose story with Moses is the most oft-repeated in the Quran) when he declared he was God to people. Again, what you see is the denial of truth embedded in a desire for self-worship.
 
Pharaoh ordered his minister to build a massive structure (called a sarh) into the sky, so he can reach the depth of the heavens to discover how things work and to go to this God that Moses worships, because he thought Moses was lying. So he was telling people he was God, Most High, yet he wanted to unlock the secrets of the Universe to see if Moses was lying.
 
So we see this happening today particularly in the likes of Scientism’s high priests such as Richard Dawkins and Stephen Hawking, the latter being both a genius and a testimony to the miracle of technology, and in undertakings like the CERN particle accelerator. Hawking, who is treated like a Shaykh or even a Prophet, now claims to know, with certainty, that the Universe created itself. The establishment that made Hawking into what he is - is building a massive sarh of their own to uncover the causes, to unlock the secrets of the Universe.
 
Like Pharaoh many are obsessed with figuring out how everything works, and also like Pharaoh they do not think that what the prophets said is true. They are full of doubt and conjecture concerning the certainties of life. And they propagate doubt and uncertainty as if it were truth because they can build wondrous things “that work”.
 
Delusion is very much present. Inventing the wheel doesn’t necessarily make you fit to determine its ethical usage; it just makes you a great inventor. But many people don’t see things that way, and after arriving at the conclusion that what the prophets said was wrong they then labor under the assumption that by striving to figure out how everything works, they can figure out what everything means.
 
With that Pharaoh-like mindset it is easy to proclaim one’s self one’s God. “I play by my own rules”, “I can determine what’s right and wrong for myself” - those are the types of slogans you hear from rejecters of revelation. In a sense while Pharaoh’s was a monotheist self-worship - everyone worships him.  This approach is polytheistic - be your own goal, your own master, and your own god.
 
When such thinking becomes acceptable people start looking at submission in a particularly negative light. They see it as relegating oneself to insignificance, being humiliated and downtrodden.  Submission or surrender, in reality is not about insignificance. It is about harmony with the truth, the way things really are. It is an attitude that says: I am significant because of what I indicate and what I indicate is infinitely more significant than anything else that exists, which is Allah.
 
When people stop short of that, the result is, I am significant in and of myself and I am the center of the universe and everything is indicating me - “I play by my own rules” - like Pharaoh. Others come to the conclusion that I am insignificant and I indicate nothing.  They both agree on a common understanding, that there is no meaning to the existence of the human being.  Some people say the meaning is unclear.  Some say it is unknown.  Some say meanings themselves are byproducts of mechanical processes in the brain. When seen in the light of revelation it is all conjecture.
 
 
Wazwaz:  Does this impact Muslims though?  
 
Shaykh Qays: People are being affected by this conjecture. You have people, even religious people or Muslims, who see no real meaning in their life beyond material pursuits. They fall into depression or try to kill themselves.  In all the noise of conjecture they think God is there to help them become happy by ensuring that they are healthy, wealthy, and free in this world. They think material success what gives life substance and God is the means to get it, rather than seeing that God is the substance in life.
 
To get back to the main thought here, self-knowledge – is to see reality, to see meaning in existence, not merely to look for facts and causes then deny meaning. For example, man has this theory for the earth, and hundreds years later, another theory that refutes it.  There is a truth that is higher.  This is what faith is associated with.  The Queen saw something of huge consequence in Solomon’s letter, and she responded in kind. In contrast the people in Mecca made it clear that they took it lightly by jesting and mocking.
 
Do this experiment.  Go to YouTube and find videos by militant atheists and listen to 3-4 minutes and you will see the same pattern, this mocking, jesting. They, like stand-up comics, make witty, often irreverent, statements and people laugh - it’s a trend.  It’s about using mockery to cover meaning.
 
In contrast, Prophet Abraham, upon him be peace, looked for the truth and looked for meaning.  In every soul – is embedded the knowledge, “Am I Not your Lord?”  This is knowledge that finds expression as an innate disposition in people that God is there and we are His.   So when signs are placed before us that bring us to that part of ourselves – some of us respond to it, like the Queen of Sheba, and some of us mock it, deny it or pretend we have better things to do.
 
 
Wazwaz:  One of the criticisms that you see from – as you call them, militant atheists – is how religious people revere the Prophets, yet they revere Stephen Hawking in a similar manner.  They use double standards toward Prophets of the Sacred Law versus people like Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking or even Sam Harris.  
 
Shaykh Qays:  I really can’t comment about any man individually.  I know very little about Hawking as a person.  However, there is a book called “Science Set free” written by Rupert Sheldrake, a scientist. He is apparently quite an accomplished scientist with years of published, peer reviewed work to his credit. In his book he exposes the shocking level of institutional dogma in the scientific establishment. He speaks about how the establishment has become like a religious institution with things you do not question, and taboos.
 
I had earlier mentioned the tendency in some quarters to joke and mock everything that Religion deems sacred - some associate that irreverence with intelligence. But even that is a mask. Humans beings were created to believe with conviction and revere based on that conviction. I believe that is why once people deem the scientific method the gateway to all truth; they begin to revere figures like Hawking in the manner you described.
Rather than genuinely seeking the truth like Abraham, the truth is left aside for people who can enable their desire for self-reverence. May God, Most High, guide us and show us the way.
 
 
Wazwaz: Can you expand on the verses in Ta-Ha more, especially "for every soul to receive its reward by the measure of its Endeavour?" I heard Habib Hussein al-Saggaf say in one of his lessons that people find what they seek and strive for.  So if someone wants and seeks greatness - he will find that.  But being great is different than being on truth.
 
Shaykh Qays: The believer is one who has read the signs of God and heeded them. He strives to live in accordance with the illuminating teachings of revelation - to worship God, the Eternal, alone without partners which lead to self-discovery, fulfillment and eventual eternal bliss, not self-worship. In the absence of those teachings man’s entire scope becomes limited to the material world that is just like him and his significant God-given potential is confined to it. So his pursuits will seldom leave the realm of self-gratification and it will never extend to eternity for he believes only in the finite and thus doesn’t seek a relationship with anything beyond it. The matter is therefore as you have related from Habib al-Saggaf - the one who works only for the finite will receive that which he strove for. Yet I would like to draw attention to two aspects of this.
 
Firstly the matter of one’s eternal fate pertains to belief and disbelief or and not to group association. That is why I made it a point to speak of believers striving to live in accordance with revelation as opposed to just people for whom religion is a matter merely of identity.
 
The other important aspect is that turning away from belief in God and from the guidance of revelation is certain lead one down the road of self-aggrandizement and arrogance whereby one imagines oneself to be the center of the universe and proceeds to live that perception out resulting in doing things that are actually wrong and harmful to oneself and one’s eternal fate. One such evil lies in the pursuit of power and influence which can make people selfish and ruthless and Pharaoh-like. So when the verse in Sura Taha speaks about people getting that which they strove for it indicates that those who strove for good will find it and those who strove for evil likewise. That is with the understanding that doing good is only through faith and that evil is necessary a result of a lack of faith.
 
Elsewhere in the Quran, in chapter 47, verse 19 God says, “Have knowledge that there is no deity but God and seek forgiveness for your sin...” Scholars have explained that that command to “have knowledge” entails two things: learning and accepting the truth contained in revelation about the oneness of God and the ultimate good (in the next world) that is the result of that knowledge and acceptance, and seeking rectification and purification of one’s character and spirit through heeding the Divine command, being accountable to the command, and holding fast to repentance.
 
So those who act on the knowledge of revelation with acceptance seek a level moral of purification, if you will, that is based on absolute accountability beyond this world. The fruits of that purification should be apparent in this world and it is not to be found in intellectual exercises and philosophical discourse, but rather in traits like humility and submission to the Divine, and a keen awareness of one’s condition physical, mental, and spiritual in light of the standard of revelation.
 
That kind of awareness is not easy to attain, it requires seeking knowledge, practicing ritual worship with discipline and consistency, measuring one’s conduct by the standard of the prophets and saintly people, and turning to God constantly for help and forgiveness when, not if, one falls short. When someone rejects faith and revelation they reject that type of life in favor of one where they live by their own rules and within the confines of whatever they personally accept as knowledge.
 
So though that rejection may be cloaked in logical and intellectual arguments, the final result is still the same: an avoidance of the truth of the human being’s ultimate responsibility to actually be moral and be in accordance with the truth by a standard that is well beyond worldly interests and into the realm of eternal interests, accountability, and well-being. So in chapter 2, verse 282 we find “...fear God and God will teach you...” meaning that those one who submit to the limits in revelation will be taught by God and granted “light” a special type of knowledge that is based on the firm evidences and arguments of revelation - through which one will be able to distinguish truth from falsehood. And that we ask of God, the Mighty, the Able.
 
(To Be Continued...)

Conversation with Qays Arthur on Faith and Guidance 6c

Posted by: Fedwa Wazwaz under Education and literacy, Continuing education Updated: March 17, 2013 - 8:25 AM
  • share

    email

“In their hearts is a disease; and God has increased their disease: And grievous is the penalty they (incur), because they are false (to themselves).”
(Quran 2:10)

This conversation is part of a series of conversations toward understanding Islam and Muslims.  It is not a debating piece, but a reflective one.  It is meant to clarify some of the confusion on Islamic beliefs.  In this conversation we are addressing surrender or submission from the angle of self-knowledge.  We discussed the importance of embracing our vulnerability, mortality, our spirituality and here we focus briefly on the human tendency to engage in self-deception.

Surrendering to God is about being awake and aware that you cannot trick or deceive God, as He knows the deep secrets of our souls, hearts and minds.  As humans, we may deceive others while our souls bear witness to the truth.  We may also engage in self-deception - but God is aware of what lurks in our hearts and minds.  We must ask ourselves how can we receive the Higher Truth when we are false to ourselves?  Surrender is about self-accountability at a very deep level.  

The beginning of this conversation is here and continued here.  This conversation on surrender will focus in on a few verses of the Qur'an.  The conversation is quite detailed and long and requires some thought and reflection.  I will address civil questions at the end.  The previous blogs on the Queen of Sheeba are here: 5a and 5b.    

(Qur’an al-Waqia: 80-86)
“A Revelation from the Lord of the Worlds. Is it such a Message that ye would hold in light esteem? And have ye made it your livelihood that ye should declare it false? Then why do ye not (intervene) when (the soul of the dying man) reaches the throat,- And ye the while (sit) looking on,- But We are nearer to him than ye, and yet see not,- Then why do ye not,- If you are exempt from (future) account,- Call back the soul, if ye are true (in the claim of independence)?”  

(Qur’an Ta-Ha: 14-16)
"Verily, I am Allah: There is no god but I: So serve thou Me (only), and establish regular prayer for celebrating My praise.”Verily the Hour is coming - My design is to keep it hidden - for every soul to receive its reward by the measure of its Endeavour. "Therefore let not such as believe not therein but follow their own lusts, divert thee therefrom, lest thou perish!"

 

Wazwaz: There is an issue that I want us to reflect on between the Queen of Sheeba and the group of people mentioned in Al Waqia. The similarity I see is that both the Queen of Sheeba and the Meccans were born into a world of no faith. She received a letter worthy of respect and her response is interesting given her negative experience with kings. On the other hand, the Meccans received the message from a Prophet who lived amongst them and whom they gave the title Al-Amin, or the trustworthy one. Despite her negative experience with kings, she investigates and seeks advice from her court and goes to meet Prophet Solomon, upon him be peace. In contrast, despite their witnessing the truthfulness and trustworthiness of Prophet Muhammad, upon him be peace and blessings, the group addressed in these verses – became arrogant. They do not investigate or seek advice but attacked him.

Another difference that I see is where the Queen compliments the letter they attack faith him ferociously without reflection or investigation.


Shaykh Qays: The verses in Al-Waqia are addressing the group of Meccans who are deluded with their wealth and power. Guidance ultimately comes from God and it has to do with the condition of people’s hearts. In the words of the Queen, we see a heart that is humble and connected to the reality of her circumstance. The Meccans – we see the normal type of reaction. What I mean is the Queen did not respond like normally those in power respond. Her reaction is atypical as she saw that Solomon, upon him be peace, was not writing to increase his power or reign, but out of principle.

The letter was strange – but she recognized it was an atypical invitation. The letter was addressed, “In the Name of God, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful.” She saw the dignified and respectful nature in the letter. The Meccans – also received the same strange atypical invitation. They also found it strange that Prophet Muhammad, upon him be peace and blessings, would address them, “In the Name of God, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful.” They never referred to God, as Ar-Rahman or Ar-Raheem (The Most Compassionate; The Most Merciful). That was foreign and strange to them.

It appealed to some Arabs except those with vested interests. The Queen also had vested interests, but her heart was fertile and she sought advice, as she was willing to rise above herself and her interests. The matter returns to God’s grace. God’s grace makes all the difference.

The Queen is one person and we know her outcome at the end. With the Meccans, some of those that fought Prophet Muhammad, upon him be peace and blessings, in the end became Muslim. The verse is a wakeup call, that these people know what it is like to be at the deathbed and God reminds them of that.

During the revelation of the Qur’an, the companions of the Prophet, upon him be peace and blessings, would at times feel overcome with fear, awe, or anxiety due to the weightiness of the Quran’s moral teachings. Sometimes the Prophet, upon him be peace and blessings, would explain the enormity of things like wrongfully taking from the spoils of war, and the companions would ask questions about things they did in order to know whether what they did was wrong. At time they would be devastated by what the moral warnings in verses of the Quran. Yet, they accepted the Quran’s weighty moral force and were purified by these verses. So there are many personalities, it is not just the Queen on one hand versus the Pharaoh on the other. There are many shades in between as well. There are many people who do wrong and accept the warnings and the call to purification and faith.

 

Wazwaz: You said there are many people who do wrong yet they accept the warnings and the call to purification and faith. In other words, "their souls were convinced." However, instead of fighting the truth, they rose and submitted to it like the Queen of Sheeba. Can you expand on your comment in light of this verse in the Qur’an which addresses another mask people wear?


“And they rejected those Signs in iniquity and arrogance, though their souls were convinced thereof: so see what was the end of those who acted corruptly!” (Qur’an 27:14)


Shaykh Qays: What it tells us is true faith requires integrity. I hinted at such in the conversation on the Queen of Sheeba when I spoke of seeing the writing on the wall. Here is a lady who had knowledge and was properly advised by her advisors concerning a decision that would impact her realm, her prestige, her family, all her interests. She had this great realm but she also had personal integrity and that is why her heart is a fertile place for faith, not because she was weak or afraid. She had advisors who were given to vehement warfare. She had a formidable army or force and could possibly win. She went with that knowledge and Solomon wanted to see if she would behave the way normally rulers normally behaved. She proved to be a person of integrity.

Reflecting on Tasawwuf or self-knowledge, a corrupt person in a situation like that - while going on the journey - would likely say to themselves, “this King is probably a liar like all the other kings, he is probably an impostor”. A corrupt person may thus prepare themselves for confrontation or they may, with their false assumptions about the other party, contemplate bribery or some other form of corruption to get rid of their opponent. In their heart, there is only self-interest, corruption, and tyranny. We seek refuge from God from this state. Yet, the Queen of Sheba reaches Solomon, upon him peace, and finds he is sincere. She sees the writing on the wall and acts on it. This is integrity. This is enabling grace from God.

Still there are people who may not be happy with the writing on the wall but they will work on themselves against their oppositional feelings - and open their hearts to faith. Jihad-an-Nafs or struggle against the ego is about that kind of work, the purification of the soul. The people of such struggle acknowledge that their internal state is lacking and fight themselves so to speak. This too is faith. In the case of the Queen - her heart was sincere, an enabling grace from God. But even if a heart was not fertile in the beginning, still to recognize the truth, and recognize your heart has problems, and to work on it, that is also faith.

We see cases where people are convinced based on certain knowledge that they had, yet they opposed it to the end due to self-interest. That is Kufr or disbelief. They will oppose strongly and fight the writing on the wall because it is not in their interest. So conviction is not enough. You can be convinced of the truth, reject it and thus be a disbeliever. 

Submission and acceptance of the truth based on evidence, that is belief or faith.

 

Wazwaz: Furthermore, in the same chapter we are given a deeper reflection on a group of people who attack Islam without comprehension. So their fear is really a reflection of their blind attachment to whatever they believe, but are not in reality convinced of. If they were convinced of something else, they would invite to it out of a sense of generosity. However, they shut the doors to anyone understanding anything that is not similar to their blind attachment. Their internal reality is described well in this verse:

“Nor canst thou be a guide to the blind, (to prevent them) from straying: only those wilt thou get to listen who believe in Our Signs, and they will bow in Islam. (81) ...Until, when they come (before the Judgment-seat), (God) will say: ‘Did ye falsify My Signs, though ye comprehended them not in knowledge, or what was it ye did?’” (84)

Shaykh Qays:  People are accountable to the extent of their abilities and the truth that reaches them.  Both of these groups of people have the ability to recognize the truth.  The act of Kufr (disbelief) is taktheeb (to falsify).  So the verse is saying you cried lies to My Signs - you have the ability to recognize the signs, yet, you turned away.

This falsifying varies slightly between the groups.  A heart that is absorbed in itself will only glorify it's like in nature, or only pursue a means to its own glorification.  Externally, deniers may claim to have come to a reasoned rationale to deny God.  But deep down in their souls they are denying the signs for selfish purposes - yet, if they used their mind they would see the writing on the wall.

Everyone is accountable and taktheeb is in the heart.  People of taktheeb prefer it to seeing the truth.  We seek refuge from God from that.  They fall into a state of heedlessness because they choose to run away, to escape and avoid the steep road to understanding - not because they do not have the capacity to understand - but because they chose to turn away or cover up the truth.

Some people remain in that state of rejection, whereas others come around to faith and submission through the Enabling Grace of God which we are all in need of.

 

(To Be Continued...)

Conversation with Qays Arthur on Faith and Guidance 6b

Posted by: Fedwa Wazwaz under Education and literacy, Continuing education Updated: March 13, 2013 - 10:24 AM
  • share

    email

“Truly dost thou marvel, while they ridicule, And, when they are admonished, pay no heed,- And, when they see a Sign, turn it to mockery,”
(Quran 37:12-14)


The conversation is being continued from here.  This conversation will focus in on a few verses of the Qur'an.  The conversation is quite detailed and long and requires some thought and reflection.  I will address civil questions at the end.  The previous blogs on the Queen of Sheeba are here: 5a and 5b. 

(Qur’an al-Waqia: 80-86)
“A Revelation from the Lord of the Worlds. Is it such a Message that ye would hold in light esteem? And have ye made it your livelihood that ye should declare it false? Then why do ye not (intervene) when (the soul of the dying man) reaches the throat,- And ye the while (sit) looking on,- But We are nearer to him than ye, and yet see not,- Then why do ye not,- If you are exempt from (future) account,- Call back the soul, if ye are true (in the claim of independence)?”  

(Qur’an Ta-Ha: 14-16)
"Verily, I am Allah: There is no god but I: So serve thou Me (only), and establish regular prayer for celebrating My praise.”Verily the Hour is coming - My design is to keep it hidden - for every soul to receive its reward by the measure of its Endeavour. "Therefore let not such as believe not therein but follow their own lusts, divert thee therefrom, lest thou perish!"

 

Wazwaz: Everyone seeks and wants to know the truth, but with the exception of a few, we all prepare ourselves to receive it selectively. Many of us are prepared to receive truth that validates us, benefits us and elevates us against others. However, truth seekers don’t just seek the truth, but they also prepare themselves to receive it, all of it - since many truths are against us, against our views, our desires, and our opinions. Comment on the Queen of Sheeba and the group addressed in Al-Waqia?  Like the Meccans, she received a message from a prophet, but her response is drastically different. How do we understand her response in comparison?


Shaykh Qays
: The prophets call to something outside of themselves, to a higher source, a Higher Truth which, in reality is but God Himself. Queen of Sheeba was concerned with the truth, seeking knowledge, and having a life based on higher principles. The Queen put the principle of the truth, and living on the truth, and receiving the truth, above everything else, including their position, their culture, their religion, their wealth, etc.,


According to Islamic teachings, revelation is about noble values that guide to the originator of the heavens and the earth. So our understanding is that desires and selfish interests affect one’s perception and reception of the truth. People may be convinced of the truth, but may oppose it anyway because what is important to them is what they accumulate from this world.


From an Islamic perspective, you also have people who prevent themselves from recognizing the truth; they make excuses. We see this in many people in Mecca, where they made excuses like, saying the Prophet (peace be upon him) was insane or possessed. This was done, in fact, to all the Prophets. There are and always have been people who have vested interests, who use mockery and attacks to oppose the truth and nurture an environment where it is maligned and mocked. They say the person is mad. Today they say the people are uncivilized. Today, some people view Muslims as uncivilized.


During his presidential campaign, someone asked Senator John McCain if Obama was an Arab or Muslim, and Senator McCain responded that these accusations are not true, as Obama is a decent family man. So that is a kind of an excuse. In such excuses there is self-deception rather than self-knowledge. Such excuses allow people to fool themselves. For true self-knowledge to take place one has to have a direct relationship with God. There is something called the truth, and it has a greater right over us than everything we do and own. So Prophet Abraham said,

"Indeed, my prayer, my rites of sacrifice, my living and my dying are for Allah, Lord of the worlds. No partner has He. And this I have been commanded, and I am the first [among you] of the Muslims." (Al-An`am 6:162-163)

 

Wazwaz: Would you agree that one accepts their mortality while the other is divorced from the knowledge of their mortality. One has self-knowledge of who they are while the other is in delusion and acts like they are immortal. They might claim to believe in death, but act as though they are independent of it.

Shaykh Qays: God is addressing a group of people who have forgotten something and He is reminding of it -, that at the moment of death - they are in dreadful anticipation. They are sitting there anticipating, waiting, powerless and vulnerable, dreading what is to come. Yet when they are talking to the Prophet, they are mocking, ridiculing, and jesting instead of listening, reflecting and investigating what the Prophet is saying.

God is reminding them that now you are in this state, but when you are sitting looking at someone who is about to die, someone dear to you, someone precious to you that is not in your state. Remember the reality of your state and that death will face you as well and with it the fear of God. God is simply describing the reality of their state at that time. It is a precise and clear description. Everyone is there, everyone is vulnerable, and everyone is traumatized.


Humble yourself and ask if your attitude toward the revelation, or your attitude toward the truth correct? Think about it when you consider that you are NOT able to bring back the soul, your precious loved one, not the machine, but your dear one back to life. I do not think that they felt that they could bring the soul back, but they are being reminded of what they knew from experience but forgot as they jested and mocked. I do not agree that the condition of the believer is always positive.


Both groups mutually disprove each other, and mutually act on what they believe. In Al-Waqia, God is reminding that group by bringing them to a point of vulnerability. It is a rhetorical challenge, not an actual challenge. So yes, there is that disconnection as you said.

 

Wazwaz: How would you comment on what you believe is the source of disconnection?

Shaykh Qays: The source of disconnection is the nafs (ego) and hawa (desires). They are content with the status quo, just how Mecca was, just how the idols were, just how the Kab’ah is, just how their fathers were worshipping. The status quo was self-serving, so they were content with it. They do not want to be bothered with self-accountability on the Day of Judgment, and reflecting on everything that they do, at every moment of the day. That state is called taqwa, being constantly aware.


When you look at animals, I was saying to my son recently, if we look at animals, they are seldom unaware. They are constantly alert; their ears turn this way and that way. Yet human beings who live on the same planet want to be oblivious. They want to sit back and relax and be oblivious to everything around us. Faith calls us to reality, to be constantly aware, to be conscious, to think, to listen, to reflect on our vulnerability, to be awake. The source of the problem here is the people’s stubborn attachment to their desires and ultimately to this World.
 

(To Be Continued...)

Conversation with Qays Arthur on Faith and Guidance 6a

Posted by: Fedwa Wazwaz under Education and literacy, Continuing education Updated: March 11, 2013 - 8:45 AM
  • share

    email

"No man can reveal to you aught but that which already lies half asleep in the dawning of your knowledge. The teacher who walks in the shadow of the temple, among his followers, gives not of his wisdom but rather of his faith and his lovingness. If he is indeed wise he does not bid you enter the house of his wisdom, but rather leads you to the threshold of your own mind.”
--Khalil Gibran, The Prophet


In previous blogs, I began a conversation with Shaykh Qays Arthur, titled, Toward Understanding Islam and Muslims.  Currently, Shaykh Qays gives private lessons on worship and Islamic beliefs at his home in Amman, Jordan and via the website QaysArthur.net.  In the conversation, we addressed monotheism, including several spiritual aspects on faith and guidance.  This blog will address the issue of surrender or submission in Islam, and it will complete the section on faith and guidance.


Surrendering to God requires knowledge, and not just knowledge, but more importantly self-knowledge.  In truth, you cannot surrender to God without knowledge.  In this blog – I want to first explore the concept of surrendering to God, or submission, which has been misunderstood as nurturing a mindset of blind obedience, an inferiority complex or irrational belief.  


Many of the conversations in the Qur’an aim to take us to the threshold of our own mind, the part that lies asleep, so we can stop, reflect, remember and understand.  I found the conversations to be quite unique and upon reflection, God removes the masks we wear to expose our inner reality, layer by layer, to help us see ourselves and our arguments with more precision and reflection.  Hence, as I explore surrender or submission to God, I will focus mainly on the importance of self-knowledge.


This conversation will focus in on a few verses of the Qur’an.  The conversation is quite detailed and requires some thought and reflection.  It is not meant for easy quick reading.  It is quite long and will be posted in parts.  If you can hold your questions til the end, as the conversation will first try to reconcile the previous discussions and then fully explain submission in Islam.  I will address civil questions at the end.

Wazwaz:  Shaykh Qays, I want to share with you some verses in the Qur’an regarding two groups of people and if we can focus on them for this conversation.  Can you share your initial comments on the following?

(Qur’an al-Waqia: 80-86)
“A Revelation from the Lord of the Worlds. Is it such a Message that ye would hold in light esteem? And have ye made it your livelihood that ye should declare it false? Then why do ye not (intervene) when (the soul of the dying man) reaches the throat,- And ye the while (sit) looking on,- But We are nearer to him than ye, and yet see not,- Then why do ye not,- If you are exempt from (future) account,- Call back the soul, if ye are true (in the claim of independence)?”  

(Qur’an Ta-Ha: 14-16)
"Verily, I am Allah: There is no god but I: So serve thou Me (only), and establish regular prayer for celebrating My praise.”Verily the Hour is coming - My design is to keep it hidden - for every soul to receive its reward by the measure of its Endeavour. "Therefore let not such as believe not therein but follow their own lusts, divert thee therefrom, lest thou perish!"


Shaykh Qays:  From my reading the commentary on both, the verses in al-Waqia address a group of people who live in a world of rejection, and denial of the obvious. The Qur'an calls people to reflect on things that they are familiar with that ought to bring them to correct conclusions regarding truth. But people who are bent otherwise don't see it.


So the Qur'an advanced its argument to remind people about what it is that they ought to see by way of meanings as they experience life. One of the things I found interesting in the commentary of the verses in chapter Al-Waqia is how the Qur'an calls people to reflect on the moment of death.  This was not an uncommon experience in the past but it has become something of a rarity in contemporary society. Such things as death are taught and seen from a “scientific” point of view. There is no reflection on it. Like living, death, we are taught, goes back to functions of systems: the nervous, circulatory, respiratory systems simply stopped functioning due to some mechanical cause. The philosophical assumption being that the human being is a machine in a universe that is a machine. But the Qur’an speaks to the meaning of it all, beyond the mechanics. And it speaks to people who see themselves not as machines but as human beings who are creatures of purpose and meaning. It calls us back to a distinctly pre-modern mindset based on the grit of real life and, in this case, the death experience. I find this to be something that is extremely powerful and needed.


People now, perhaps more-so the young, need to come back to fundamental questions like that of purpose. Such questions require real knowledge to answer; not trials, studies, and theories. Contrary to what many of us are taught we are not merely machines. This we learn from Revelation, the highest source of knowledge we have. The fact that we are similar to machines in terms of how we function does not mean that is the reality of who we are. The Qur'an calls us to be aware of ourselves, aware of our circumstances, connected to reality; mere machines can’t do what the Qur’an asks. Our circumstance - what does it mean? This verse of the Qur'an is calling humanity to look at or rather recall the theater of death, if you will. It reminds us about something that is traumatic and humbling in its certainty, that tells us about our reality, and is worthy of reflection.


So it may be said that what revelation is doing is teaching us to read the signs that Allah has placed within us, and around us. That is perhaps, in today’s world, the most needed type of literacy and education.

Wazwaz: In Al-Waqia - verse 82 – there is an emphasis on negating something in an obsessive manner. I read it as defining your life on negating something that you do not believe is true instead of acting on what you believe is true. Do you agree?


Shaykh Qays: Well an obsessive approach is not necessarily bad in itself - artists and craftsmen are sometimes said to be obsessive about their craft. Neither is rejecting something in itself bad. For example, God says to those who believe, love God more than anything else. Those who believe could thus be said to have an obsessive love for Allah, while those who disbelieve have obsessive love for their idols. Also, God describes believers as those who reject falsehood while those who disbelieve reject truth. I don’t see it as saying simply that believers have a positive approach that focuses on affirmation while disbelievers have a negative approach that focuses on rejection which seems to be what you are saying unless I misunderstood you.


Wazwaz:  Let me clarify. What I am referring to is the lack of self-knowledge in people mentioned in the set of verses of Al-Waqia versus the people mentioned in Ta-Ha.  One group is obsessed with rejecting and promoting the other as standing on falsehood, whereas the other people are focused and aware on what they believe.  Is that clearer?


Shaykh Qays: The disbeliever strives to act on what he believes, not unlike the believer. And the disbeliever also strives to reject what they do not believe, like the believer. In our declaration of faith, for example, we start by rejecting or negating - there is no deity - then affirmation - except God - There is no deity except God. Our declaration of faith begins with an active rejection of all deities.  Both groups, believers and unbelievers, engage in rejection and affirmation. The distinction between the two is that one group denies falsehood and affirms the truth while the other group denies truth and affirms falsehood.

Another clear distinction is in what you referred to as self-knowledge. One group is honest and submits to the truth, and is not in an oppositional state of mind when it comes to the truth. This is manifested in that they are people who are humble servants who accept who they are, while the other group is arrogant, stingy, self-serving and concerned with their livelihoods in this world and accumulation of wealth, and/or fame, prestige, or power in this world.

To say that the overall state of the believer is constant positive action on what he believes while the state of the disbeliever is constant negating is a partial truth since they both engage in rejecting and affirming.

 

(To Be Continued...)

For clarification:

This conversation is meant for education only.  The internet is saturated with misinterpretations of the Qur'an and the term kafir, or disbeliever.   Some ignorant Muslims also have done damage by also interpreting the verses based on their own ego and their own pathology. 

According to Islamic teachings: "God will ask us about ourselves, not about what He should do with others."  It is strictly NON-INVOLVEMENT.  Saints and Prophets who are given Divine permission to appeal on behalf of others, appeal ONLY for DIVINE MERCY, not punishment.  While they had tremendous desire to see people in heaven and saved, they did not deceive humanity, and clearly said they have NO POWER to protect anyone from God.  They are given Divine permission to appeal for those who accept their station, and strive to follow them.

At the level of individuals, it is a major question as to what reaching and rejecting faith entail. This is why as Muslims, we cannot judge whether individual non-Muslims are in Hell — or, for that matter, in Heaven.  Likewise of Muslims.  As Muslims, we must also check ourselves if we are hypocrites or believers.  Likewise for me, I cannot say I am destined for Heaven.  I cannot say I am saved.  I do not know my state.  It is with awareness and not delusion that we read the Qur'an and reflect on our inner reality.  For references to help understand this conversation see the following links from SeekersGuidance: rejecting faith 1, rejecting faith 2 and rejecting faith 3.

 

Reflecting on King's Challenge to America

Posted by: Fedwa Wazwaz under Society, Violence, Education and literacy, Government, Politics Updated: January 20, 2013 - 2:50 AM
  • share

    email

On December 14, 2012, late in the afternoon - I became aware of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. It was painful to read the stories, emails and newsfeed as they poured over the tragedy. In times of crisis and pain like this, as a Muslim I immediately turn to prayer to gain strength and to reflect on the situation. In the evening, I joined an online prayer service on SeekersHub in Toronto.

The Toronto team was able to gather a large crowd at the Hub and online for our prayer for the victims and families of the murder in Connecticut. "The believer is pained by the pain of another," said Shaykh Faraz Rabbani while leading the prayers for the affected families of Connecticut.

Mainly through social media discussions, I began reading various viewpoints regarding the shooting. Some argued for greater gun control. Is this tragedy due to a lack of gun control policies? Maybe. We can consider this argument. But let us consider the argument that frequent mass shootings of innocent people are not symptoms of lack of gun control policies as well. Did Timothy McVeigh use guns in the Oklahoma bombing?

 
Others compared the discourse on the Newton Shooting to a month earlier discourse on the Israeli bombing of Gaza. On November 2012 - while bombs were hitting Gaza, and over 160 people died – many of whom were children, the US House of Representatives in one minute gave its “vigorous support” and “unwavering commitment” to Israel. Both, the U.S. Senate and House passed by unanimous consent resolutions defending Israel's bombing of the Gaza Strip. These resolutions expressed no regret or mourning at the Palestinian loss of lives.
 
In response to the resolution, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) disputed statements that the U.S. House of Representative unanimously endorsed Israel's “right to act in self-defense” in Gaza. According Rep Kucinich, the bill was introduced at 12:04 pm. The resolution was “agreed without objection” by 12:05 pm. “There was no notice, no committee hearing, no discussion and no debate. In such a fashion, we achieve unanimity on great matters related to the Middle East,” said Rep. Kucinich.
 
As the discussion on the Newton shooting continued, some commented on the use of drones in Pakistan, and how the deaths of innocent people in Pakistan by US drone strikes has passed without mourning, grief or reflection in the US. Recently, a U.S. drone killed eight people in rural Pakistan, bringing the estimated death toll from drone strikes in Pakistan this year to 35.
 
In a Washington Post article published on January 13, 2013 - Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minnesota) argued, "A recent study by human rights experts at Stanford Law School and the New York University School of Law found that the number of innocent civilians killed by U.S. drone strikes is much higher than what the U.S. government has reported: approximately 700 since 2004, including almost 200 children."

What does the violence in Gaza or Pakistan have to do with the Newton Shooting? I believe they are all connected.
 
Prophet Muhammad, upon him peace and blessings taught Muslims that, "The people before you were destroyed because they used to inflict the legal punishments on the poor and forgive the rich." This is not just an Islamic teaching but it was also taught by noble Americans who nurtured our country to a higher understanding of human dignity and value.
 
On April 4, 1967, Reverend Martin Luther King challenged America regarding the Vietnam War. In my opinion, what is true of the Vietnam War is true of the war in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and in Gaza, where many Palestinian civilians were killed funded by the US tax dollars. In "Vietnam: A Time Comes When Silence is Betrayal," Martin Luther King said the following:
 
"My third reason [for opposing the war] moves to a deeper level of awareness, for it grows out of my experience in the ghettos of the North over the past three summers. As I have walked among the desperate, rejected and angry young men I have told them that Molotov cocktails and rifles would not solve their problems. I have tried to offer them my deepest compassion while maintaining my conviction that social change comes most meaningfully through nonviolent action. But they asked me, and rightfully so, what about Vietnam? They asked if our own nation wasn't using massive doses of violence to solve its problems, to bring about the changes it wanted. Their questions hit home, and I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today my own government, for the sake of hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent…”
This weekend - as a nation we will celebrate Reverend King's life. As we reflect on his life - let us step in his shoes and imagine having a face to face interaction with the desperate, rejected and angry young Gazans or Pakistanis, like King had with the Blacks in the ghettos.
 
Then, they ask us, and rightfully so, what about Gaza and Pakistan, and look at the destruction of Gaza funded by US Tax dollars? And they further ask if our own nation wasn't using massive doses of violence to solve its problems, to bring about the changes it wanted. Doesn't the US hit Pakistan with drones killing innocent people in Pakistan? How can we talk about gun control when we are financing violence in Gaza. How will we respond?
 
Like Prophet Muhammad and MLK, I firmly believe you cannot condemn the violence of the oppressed until you firmly condemn the violence of the strong, of those with power and influence.
 
A condemnation of the violence in Connecticut requires us to also condemn the violence which killed many nameless children by our own weapons. Our drones and missiles kill children as well, and not just guns. Instead of a national debate on gun control, we need a national debate on all forms of violence and accountability to the rule of law. 
 
Furthermore, I encourage us to reflect on our thought processes and our self-defense rhetoric and ask ourselves - how different is our voice and our thoughts from those that took the lives of innocents in school shootings? Are we looking at people outside our boundaries, over there, the way the shooters behind the school shootings looked at our innocents in schools? Has our pain and fears blinded and deafened us from seeing, hearing or comprehending the voices of those "hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence?"  Read the article - The reviews are in: 'Zero Dark Thirty makes me hate muslims'
 
Tragic events like the Connecticut shooting remind us to do some soul searching. What makes any country great is the commitment to great principles like human dignity, human rights, value of life and rule of law. Are we going to hold ourselves accountable for selectively applying these principles when they suit us? Do we believe these principles are for everyone or only for certain Americans?
 
I think it is important for the American perspective to wake up and realize that all human life is created equal and that problems far worse do exist and need to be addressed just as urgently. By saying this, I don't at all mean to minimize the brutal massacre of children and school teachers or the pain and suffering of those who are in Connecticut. What I do mean is that violence like this is far more widespread than we realize, and that where these types of events occur on a massive scale there is rarely a movement to hold perpetrators with power and influence accountable to the rule of law.
 
My heart goes out to the people who were affected by the unspeakable crime in Newtown and to all the nameless and faceless children who died everywhere without a committee hearing, discussion, public debate and mourning.

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters
Search by category

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT