
YOUR GUIDE TO THE TWIN CITIES



Many of us have been exactly where Bruce and Esther in this video have been . . . .trying to get that techno thinga-majingy to work. Only most of us didn't have our granddaughter share the experience with more than 8 million people and counting.
Bruce and Esther Huffman, who live in Oregon and stars of this video are great sports. While trying to get their laptop camera to work, they're unknowingly taping themselves. He makes faces, sings, burps, gets frisky. And she keeps focused on getting the dang thing to work.
Technology . . . today's candid camera.
This short video provides a quick glimpse at what we as Minnesotans and Americans face. It's an incredible opportunity for transformation in so many ways. What opportunties for change do you see?

Katy Read had an interesting story recently in the Star Tribune asking about what language we should use to refer to older people. One thought that comes to mind is “people.”
She writes:
"Mature" could conceivably apply to a well-behaved teenager. "Retiree" refers to a job status, not a life stage. "Old-timer" evokes a long white beard and overalls outside the general store. "Elder" sounds, to some ears, a bit artificially tribal. But tack on a "ly" and it's far worse -- in many people's minds, "elderly" might as well be a synonym for "frail."
So what the heck should we call people who are, um, you know ... old?
It's an interesting question.
A few years ago Ecumen commissioned a statewide survey of baby boomers on a variety of topics related to their future and aging. One question tested a couple of phrases, asking which they found most appealing: senior, elder, older adult and third ager. We didn't include "senior citizen" because it just seems dated.
- 48% favored “senior”
- 40% favored “older adult”
- 9 % favored “elder”
- 2% favored “third ager”
- 1% said “none”
Does senior work for you, or do you have other ideas?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT