MSP has more 'close calls' than 9 of 12 busier U.S. airports

  • Article by: PAT DOYLE , Star Tribune
  • Updated: March 17, 2014 - 9:42 AM

Experts say its runway layout may be a factor in the high number of “close calls.”

hide

Planes are monitored from airport towers like this one, but the layout of MSP runways poses a challenge.

Photo: DAVID JOLES • djoles@startribune.com,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

The latest and most comprehensive report of air traffic control problems reveals that planes flew too close to each other more often around Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport than at most of the nation’s busier airports.

Minneapolis-St. Paul ranked 13th in plane traffic but saw more problems than nine of the 12 busier U.S. airports.

The incidents were discovered by a new safety system that stresses greater use of automation and voluntary reporting to detect and document air traffic control problems. Nationwide, reported incidents more than doubled under the increased scrutiny.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) withheld details of problems at each airport when it announced the overall numbers last September. The FAA recently released a breakdown in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by the Star Tribune.

The agency didn’t offer a specific reason for the higher numbers at the Minneapolis-St. Paul tower.

“Each airport has a unique set of operational procedures and runway configurations, which may be further complicated by flight paths from surrounding airports, local noise procedures and a high density of operations,” FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown said when asked about MSP.

But current and former air traffic controllers say the airport’s layout, urban location and heavy reliance on two runways can create a more challenging environment than airports with more room to maneuver.

“It’s more of a downtown airport, that makes it more complicated,” said William Schroeder, who teaches air traffic control at the University of North Dakota’s School of Aerospace Sciences.

More trouble than Atlanta

The latest figures show the airport tower recorded 34 episodes of planes flying too close together in 2012. More than a third of them were considered significant enough to trigger a special risk analysis by the FAA.

By comparison, towers at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta and Chicago O’Hare, the first- and second-busiest airports in the nation with more than twice as many flights as Minneapolis-St. Paul, had only 18 and seven incidents, respectively. The towers at the next busiest airports, Dallas-Fort Worth and Denver, had nine and three incidents.

The FAA in September reported that its new system documented 4,394 instances nationwide when planes came closer than allowed by federal regulations. The agency noted that the incidents are rare when compared with the more than 132 million flights that occur annually, including 425,556 at MSP.

The higher figures for the Minneapolis-St. Paul tower emerge as the FAA rolls out new satellite technology that it says would improve safety by more precisely routing planes on narrow highways in the sky during takeoffs and landings.

The FAA decided last month to hold off on using the technology for takeoffs at MSP after nearby residents complained that it could send more planes over their homes. The FAA also rejected a proposal for using the technology for departures from some runways but not others, saying a partial deployment would be unsafe. The technology will be used for arrivals.

A closer look

The FAA revamped its reporting system in 2012 after the U.S. Department of Transportation’s inspector general criticized it for inadequate reporting of planes flying too close together.

The FAA requires minimum distances between planes and reports of any flights that get closer. When planes fly closer than two-thirds of a minimum distance, the incident triggers a special review.

Thirteen of the 34 recent incidents at MSP fell into that category.

“They need to take a look at why those errors occurred,” said Edmund Strong, who worked 24 years for the FAA and is now an air traffic control consultant. “Were they the same type? If they really want to get to the bottom of it, they need to send in an outside team.”

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close