The Whistleblower blog was started in 2008. Look for posts by these contributors: James Eli Shiffer, Jane Friedmann, Brandon Stahl, Eric Roper and Alejandra Matos. | Check out the Whistleblower archive.
The Star Tribune's journalists need your help blowing the whistle in Minnesota. Contact us here.
If you were one of those homeowners who watched with dismay as chunks of ice crashed onto your roof during Tuesday’s storm, the Better Business Bureau has some advice about filing insurance claims and avoiding the unscrupulous contractors who always pop up after storms:
The owner of the Grain Belt Beer sign had to turn down a $10,000 anti-graffiti grant, but he’s upbeat that the downtown Minneapolis billboard will reclaim its glory.
On April 17, Whistleblower reported how Winthrop Eastman, whose family trust owns the sign, was irked that the city was saddling him with graffiti removal fees when that money could be used to restore the sign. Last week, Eastman said he turned down a city grant to graffiti-proof the billboard for lack of matching funds.
“The good news is that the Preservation Alliance is moving very aggressively toward restoration funding of the sign,” Eastman said Friday.
He might reapply for the anti-graffiti grant to reimburse the preservation group for making the billboard hostile to taggers.
My Sunday column described the frustration of the owner of the iconic Grain Belt Beer sign, where graffiti taggers have taken over the back of the giant bottle-cap. Winthrop Eastman doesn't want to keep paying for city-ordered graffiti removal when that money could go to restore the sign and illuminate it once again. Also Sunday, Hard Data columnist Jane Friedmann reported the latest roster of sales tax scofflaws who have had their licenses revoked by the state Department of Revenue. The On Your Side column described the fight over the new product recall database, www.saferproducts.gov. It appears some in Congress object to the public getting access to unconfirmed reports of product defects. That's a dynamic that's quite familiar to us where at Whistleblower, where we frequently use this blog to air consumer complaints that we haven't verified. Unlike saferproducts.gov, we typically remove identifying information about the company and people involved, and we offer a disclaimer. But the debate over the Consumer Product Safety Commission certainly makes me wonder whether our policy should change.
My Sunday Whistleblower column described the city of Minneapolis's effort to revoke three rental licenses from landlord Spiros Zorbalas, whose properties house an estimated 2,000 people. It's part of a larger crackdown that includes publicizing the names of landlords banned from the business in MInneapolis for five years. That's the subject of Jane Friedmann's Hard Data column. The On Your Side column focused on the Oreck Corp.'s short-lived advertising ptich that its Halo vacuum and Proshield Plus portable air cleaner actually prevented the flu and other germ-related illnesses - the Federal Trade Commission put the kibosh on that claim.
The beleaguered residents of the Gramercy Club of Edina are finally emerging from three years of costly legal limbo.
In 2008, Whistleblower described how a bank had sued each co-op owner individually, even though they had made their mortgage payments, as part of its effort to repossess the property. The litigation and subsequent failures of both the development company and the foreclosing bank left the owners of 36 units wondering what would happen to them and 90 unsold units.
Following a legal settlement, a private-equity firm bought the unsold units in March, my colleague Jennifer Bjorhus reported Friday. By next fall, co-op members — most of whom are senior citizens — will become condo owners when the transition to new ownership is complete, said resident Jim Campbell.
“It’s the happy ending we were hoping for as far as we can tell,” Campbell said.
|Crime (1)||Employment (1)|
|Whistleblower (402)||Home Improvement (4)|
|Advertising claims (50)||Businesses in hot water (269)|
|Buyer beware (150)||Civil liberties (19)|
|Complaint sagas (108)||Corruption (1)|
|Dangerous products (39)||Free speech (1)|
|Government spends your money (27)||How to blow the whistle (12)|
|Loopholes (10)||Neighborhood nuisances (35)|
|Polling problems (21)||Problems on the job (14)|
|Property problems (44)||Public records (28)|
|Scams (110)||Seniors (35)|
|Whistleblowers (22)||Discrimination (3)|