The Star Tribune reported this weekend that a sudden windfall was raising questions about how to spend millions of dollars earmarked for neighborhood purposes.

Our story included a map (above) of how much each organization has received since 2011 and how much of their historical allocation remains "uncontracted."

Some expressed interest in seeing this data in its raw format, which shows the flow of money in more detail.

That breakdown, provided by the city's finance department, is embedded below. Some on the City Council have focused on the "un-contracted" category, which shows unspent funds.

"Uncontracted" does not necessarily mean the money is not tied to a specific future project, the city's neighborhood and community relations director David Rubedor said in a recent e-mail. In some cases those funds may have been set aside for a project that has not yet reached implementation phase.

In the spreadsheet below, "CPP" refers to the Community Participation Program, which replaced the Neighborhood Revitalization Program in 2011.

A city spokesman also provided this explanation of the "balance" category, which includes some funds that are nonetheless under contract:

Most of the fund balances represent funds that are allocated to specific programs through their approved neighborhood action plans, and contracted (but not yet expended). For example, many neighborhood organizations have dollars allocated to housing programs, which are contracted through other agencies. However, the dollars stay at the City until used.