Medicare payments to doctors reveal specialists as big winners

First report of doctor payments offers insights into care patterns.

The federal government spent a lot of money in 2012 on specialty eye care at 7760 France Av. S., Suite 310 — $13 million to be exact.

Seven ophthalmologists practicing at that location received more than $1 million apiece from Medicare — an amount matched by only five other Minnesota doctors — according to Wednesday’s first-ever release of data showing payments from the traditional Medicare Part B program to the nation’s doctors.

The reimbursement to VitreoRetinal Surgery in Edina is one of many surprising nuggets in Wednesday’s data release, which also paints a detailed picture of the medical care used by the nation’s 49 million Medicare patients and how the program pays doctors and other providers to deliver it.

In the case of the Edina ophthalmologists, for example, payments were high largely because of their frequent use of ranibizumab, an injectable drug used to treat age-related macular degeneration and prevent blindness.

“The drugs that we use are very expensive,” said Dr. David Williams, a partner at VitreoRetinal Surgery, “but they are actually miraculous in the benefits that they have.”

The historic release by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), after a prolonged lawsuit by various news organizations, revealed some startling patterns. While the average Minnesota ophthalmologist received $172,000 from Medicare Part B, the average family practice doctor received just $21,000 — largely for office visits and routine care. And there were huge gaps between what doctors sought to charge Medicare and what the program actually paid them.

While the data might offer gossip for the curious, health care analysts said it holds greater potential to inform the public about wide variations in health care costs and practice patterns.

“You can bet we will be looking at it and drawing some conclusions and talking to our members about it,” said Carolyn Pare, president and CEO of the Minnesota Health Action Group, an advocacy group representing businesses and other organizations paying Minnesotans’ health care bills. “There is a level of transparency here that we have never been able to achieve.”

Low costs in Minnesota

One of the most startling lessons is that Minnesota remains a low-cost state for Medicare, the federal health benefit program for the nation’s elderly. Part B, the portion that pays doctor bills, paid on average $29,971 to doctors, nurse practitioners and other health care providers in Minnesota in 2012. That was the lowest average in the nation and less than one-quarter of the $133,209 paid to the average provider in Florida.

Those figures reflect long-standing inequities in Medicare’s payment system that have penalized Minnesota’s health care efficiency.

“Someone who has the same skin cancer surgery in Arizona or Florida — their physicians will be reimbursed more in those states than a physician in Minnesota,” said Dr. Cindy Smith, president of the Minnesota Medical Association.

Smith is a Willmar, Minn., dermatologist who received more than $263,000 in Part B reimbursements in 2012, which she attributed to the accumulated skin cancer risk that comes with aging and a large Medicare population in her practice.

Smith cautioned people from reading too much into the variations in Medicare payments or getting too incensed by million-dollar amounts to specialists. An orthopedic surgeon focusing on hip replacements in the elderly will receive much more from Medicare than a colleague who provides trauma care to all ages and receives more money from private insurers, she noted. The data also doesn’t differentiate doctors by the complexity of their patients.

“The data is raw,” she said. “It doesn’t say anything about what I’m doing or the patients that I’m caring for.”

Limitations of information

Dr. Franklin Cockerill, chairman of pathology at Mayo Clinic, is a good example. He appeared to receive a whopping $11 million from Medicare in 2012 — one of the highest amounts in the nation. But that is because his name was on every lab test ordered at Mayo, which can run into the millions of lab procedures. Part B revenues in his name were passed through to the Rochester-based health care system.

“Dr. Cockerill is a salaried employee of Mayo Clinic and is not making big money from Medicare,” spokesman Bryan Anderson said.

  • Specialty Payments

    to Minnesota Providers

    Internal medicine $57.8 million

    Family practice $53 million

    Ophthalmology $50.2 million

    Diagnostic radiology $50 million

    Ambulance services $37.5 million

    Pathology $23.4 million

    Cardiology $21.5 million

    Nurse practitioner $21.1 million

    Radiation oncology $19.2 million

    ER medicine $18.9 million

    Ambulatory surgery $17.9 million

    Orthopedic surgery $17.8 million

    Dermatology $17.7 million

    Hematology/oncology $14.2 million

    Clinical laboratory $14 million

    Neurology $13.2 million

    Physician assistant $12.7 million

    Chiropractic $11.5 million

    Physical therapy $10.8 million

    Nephrology $10.8 million

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters






question of the day

Poll: How will the Wild-Chicago series turn out?

Weekly Question