Page 2 of 2 Previous

Continued: Minnesota Supreme Court ponders guardians’ role

  • Article by: DAVID CHANEN , Star Tribune
  • Last update: February 3, 2014 - 8:17 PM

Justice Anderson raised concerns about the broad authority given to guardians.

“There are no checks by anybody else,” he said. “The power is pretty significant. I wonder if the Legislature intended to give that much power.”

McLeod countered that guardians must file frequent reports on their wards and that any concerns can be brought to court. “Guardians aren’t acting in a vacuum,” he said.

Biglow suggested that the justices consider developing some guidelines.

“Right now, the court really has no knowledge when end-of-life decisions are made,” he said. “The court should know about its wards.”

The final comment came from the court’s newest justice, Wilhelmina Wright, who said, “This sounds like a legislative and not a court issue.”

And indeed, the Legislature may take up the issue this session. It’s not clear when the state Supreme Court might rule.

After the hearing, McLeod said he thought the justices thoroughly addressed critical issues on both sides. “As a lawyer, I really appreciated it,” he said. “They figured out exactly what to address.”

 

David Chanen • 612-673-4465

  • related content

  • Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie Gildea

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Can the Wild rally to win its playoff series against Colorado?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close