Minnesota offenders who win back gun rights stay out of trouble

  • Article by: BRANDON STAHL  , Star Tribune
  • Updated: March 10, 2013 - 9:04 AM

Gun rights restored, they tend not to repeat crimes with firearms.

In the past eight years, at least 114 Minnesotans have persuaded a judge that they could once again be trusted with a gun, despite past convictions of sex offenses, assaults, drug dealing and other crimes.

In most cases, they have since stayed out of trouble. Only one whose rights were restored has been convicted of a gun-related crime in the state, a Star Tribune analysis of court records has found.

State Sen. Barb Goodwin, DFL-Columbia Heights, has introduced a bill to make it more difficult for felons to win back their firearms rights. Despite the low rate of offenses by those with restored gun rights, Goodwin said she’ll continue to push the bill because she believes it could help prevent deaths in the state.

She cited the shooting of three cops in 2001 by a convicted murderer whose gun rights had been restored.

“We need more protections just in case,” she said. “I’m glad that you couldn’t find any, but I’m hoping that lasts.”

Joseph Olson, a Hamline University law professor and president of the Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance, said the lack of gun crimes shows the system works.

“We shouldn’t mess with it,” he said.

Last month, the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the state’s system of gun rights restoration. The high court rejected an appeal by a felon whose effort to get his gun rights back was blocked by a judge.

“The Second Amendment right is not unlimited and the scope of the right is subject to certain presumptively lawful exceptions,” the court wrote.

Minnesotans who have successfully gotten their firearms rights back had initially been convicted of a wide range of crimes, including 21 for drug use, sales or manufacturing; 17 for assaults; 14 for sex crimes and three for vehicular homicide.

But rarely have they re-offended. In three cases, felons who were able to get their gun rights back were convicted of drunken driving. That includes a St. Paul man who lost his gun rights due to a restraining order being filed against him by his wife. After he got his rights back, he was convicted twice of driving while intoxicated, once for giving an officer a false name and once for theft of public assistance.

In Marshall County, a man was convicted of domestic abuse-violating an order for protection, after he sent his ex-wife a hostile text message.

In the only gun-related crime, 25-year-old Chance Skorczewski of Shakopee was convicted in 2011 of carrying-under-the influence and fifth-degree assault.

Skorczewski initially lost his gun rights after he was convicted of third-degree burglary in 2007; charging records show that he broke into a garage and stole two flashlights and a box of potato chips. He successfully petitioned to have his gun rights restored in 2008.

Skorczewski said he had his gun on him one night in July 2011 when he was drinking at a bonfire and got into a fight with a friend. After he left, he was picked up by police and charged with the two counts.

He said that he still has the right to buy a weapon but that he lost his permit to carry after the bonfire incident, although he’ll seek to get that reinstated once he’s off probation this month.

“Personal protection is always my key,” he said. “When I got my permit to carry, either you carry it or you don’t. You don’t pick and choose the days. You’re going to kick yourself when you’re in the bank that one time and someone decides to hold it up and you don’t have it on you.”

For some, for hunting

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters






question of the day

Poll: Who are you rooting for in the NCAA Final Four?

Weekly Question