Flatiron Construction's proposal was the most expensive choice, but MnDOT rated it highest. Meanwhile, some officials aren't happy that the state is moving ahead so quickly.
Despite submitting the most expensive pricetag and acknowledging that it would take longer than others to do the job, a Colorado company on Wednesday won an intense competition to build the new Interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis.
A team of companies led by Flatiron Construction, the ninth-largest transportation contractor in the country, won a four-way competition with a $233.8 million bid to replace the bridge that collapsed into the Mississippi River last month and killed 13 people.
The lead company estimated that it would need just over 14 months to complete the project, and Minnesota Department of Transportation officials said construction could start by Oct. 15 and meet the goal of having a new bridge open by the end of 2008.
The selection of Flatiron, whose representatives sped out of a news conference with little comment, came on a day when Minneapolis officials and legislators again questioned the need for moving the project forward so quickly and criticized MnDOT officials for releasing few details of the new bridge's true cost.
"We have advised, recommended and asked MnDOT to wait," said Sandy Colvin Roy, a City Council member. "They didn't take that advice."
Lt. Gov. Carol Molnau, who serves as transportation commissioner, expressed no concerns as she praised her staff at the news conference: "Let me tell you, we have the best of the best right here."
While MnDOT officials said the winning company has never been used on a major project in Minnesota, Flatiron played a leading role in rebuilding the I-10 bridge over Escambia Bay in Pensacola, Fla., after it was damaged by Hurricane Ivan in 2004, and also has worked on a span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge in California.
Two of its partners on the I-35W project, Figg Engineering and Johnson Bros. Construction, have worked on projects in the Twin Cities. Figg helped build the Wabasha Street bridge in St. Paul; Johnson worked on the Hennepin Avenue suspension bridge. Both of those companies are based in Florida.
"It's very exciting," said Linda Figg, president of Figg Engineering, who disclosed few details regarding the new bridge, other than to promise that it would be "very redundant," a reference to the 40-year-old collapsed bridge's non-redundant design that brought down the entire span when one section failed.
Later, Figg said that her company, though based in Tallahassee, has been performing bridge inspections for the Crosstown Commons reconstruction project on the Minneapolis-Richfield border.
MnDOT provides few details
MnDOT officials said that because of state law they can't comment extensively on the bid award until a contract is signed, a process they hope to complete this month.
They said, however, that a host of factors made Flatiron the best-qualified company, even though its bid was about $57 million more than the lowest bidder. The company's pledge to finish the project in 437 days tied it with another company for the longest time, and was 70 days more than the shortest time, submitted by a team headed by C.S. McCrossan Construction.
Colorado-based Flatiron beat out companies with local ties, including McCrossan of Maple Grove, Ames Construction of Burnsville and Lunda Construction of Black River Falls, Wis., which describes itself as MnDOT's largest bridge contractor.
The Flatiron team could earn millions of extra dollars by finishing before the completion date that will be specified in the contract.
It could get $200,000 a day for an early finish -- up to $20 million for coming in 100 days early -- and a $7 million bonus if it needs to do extra work but doesn't ask for more time to complete it.
However, if the bridge takes longer to complete than Flatiron is promising, the company would have to pay $200,000 for every day it is late.
At Wednesday's news conference, which at times resembled a television game show, technical scores for each team were revealed on large screens.
Poll: Has the Gophers men's basketball team done better than you expected?