Craig's team makes case to change plea

  • Article by: ROCHELLE OLSON , Star Tribune
  • Updated: September 27, 2007 - 12:13 AM

The Idaho senator had intended to resign Sunday, but now he hints that he will wait for the judge's ruling on changing his plea.

The county's bomb-sniffing Labrador retrievers, Bunny and Wesley, swept the courthouse. Extra security and metal detectors were installed.

Then, before dozens of local and national news media representatives and enough onlookers to fill the 100-seat courtroom, lawyer Billy Martin made his case to allow Sen. Larry Craig to plead not guilty and to take his disorderly conduct arrest to a jury.

Hennepin County District Judge Charles Porter Jr. said that he wouldn't rule on the request until at least the end of next week, apparently extending Craig's stay on Capitol Hill in Washington.

"For now, I will continue my work in the U.S. Senate for Idaho," Craig said in a statement. He made no mention of his earlier plans to resign effective Sunday.

"No matter what Senator Craig attempted to do to make this go away, this is not a crime," Martin told reporters at a news conference after the one-hour hearing.

Prosecutor Christopher Renz said Craig knew he was doing something wrong because he cried "No!" when the undercover officer flashed his badge under the restroom stall divider in the Lindbergh terminal at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.

Craig's attempt to withdraw his guilty plea brought a whirl of activity to the court's Southdale Service Center in Edina.

About a half-dozen TV satellite trucks and tents were set up in a corner of the parking lot. A couple of pro-Craig demonstrators came in costume and carried signs. One read: "Fight terrorists, not toe-tappers" and "Next time pee, don't plea." The signs directed readers to the website www.freesenatorcraig.com.

Costumes and signs

Jason Gabbert, of Apple Valley, was dressed as an airport police officer. Anthony Wright attempted to dress as Craig. They said they brought toilets for a full-on demonstration, but were told to put them away by security officers. The two say they are political centrists, but Gabbert said Craig "shouldn't have been arrested. There was no evidence to make an arrest."

Court spokeswoman Nancy Peters said, "This is the biggest national coverage the courts have had that I've seen in at least the past 10 years."

Inside the courtroom, Porter, an experienced judge comfortable in the spotlight, sipped from a coffee mug. He ran a no-nonsense hearing, starting 15 minutes early because everyone was seated and ready.

What's disorderly conduct?

Martin insisted that Craig's actions at the airport on June 11 didn't constitute the crime of disorderly conduct. "We should not have a system of justice that allows a citizen to enter a plea of guilty for expediency to something that is not a crime," Martin argued.

He called Craig's behavior in the men's room -- tapping and bumping his foot, stroking his hand along the stall divider and peering into an occupied stall -- innocuous because there was no touching.

Craig pleaded guilty by mail in August and paid a fine.

Porter interrupted Martin often. The judge noted that most disorderly-conduct crimes do not involve contact.

Martin said, "You should have either touching or words or a combination of the two."

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: How many games will the Timberwolves win this season?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close