Bees and butterflies in mysterious decline

The impact of chemicals and GMO seeds may not be confined to farmers' fields.

hide

Bee Keeper Samantha Jones, who works for Steve Ellis, picked up a healthy hive in Barrett, Minn Ellis believes farming pesticides used in the area have been damaging several of his hives.

Photo: Renee Jones Schneider, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

 

BARRETT, MINN. - In October Steve Ellis counted his losses.

The air was thick with the sound of buzzing bees and the smoke he used to keep them calm as, one by one, he pulled wooden trays from dozens of blue and white boxes. Some held a moving mass of bees. But in too many, the hexagonal spaces were empty.

"I lost 500 hives this summer," he said.

Ellis and other beekeepers across the country say they know why they are facing astronomical losses of bees: agricultural insecticides. The companies that make the chemicals disagree, but they don't dispute the problem. On average, beekeepers are losing 30 to 40 percent of their bees every year.

"The injury does not occur at one time," said Ellis. "A lot fly off and die. Or crawl off and die."

It's not just domesticated bees that are in trouble. Many wild pollinators -- from the rusty patch bumblebee to the Karner blue butterfly -- are also declining in number, and some are in far worse shape. In a recent study of Midwest cornfields, University of Minnesota entomologist Karen Oberhauser linked the widespread use of Roundup and the disappearance of milkweed to an 81 percent drop in eggs of the monarch butterfly, the gaudy insect in mysterious decline across the country.

The threats to these species are numerous and complicated, but biologists say the encroachment of chemical-intensive agriculture on the native prairie is certainly one of them.

The impact could be profound. The honey bee and its wild cousins are a critical link in the life cycles of three-fourths of all the plants on Earth, including almonds, blueberries and most other foods that people eat.

"We would not starve without pollinators," said Eric Mader, an expert on pollinators with the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. "But we would probably have scurvy."

Talc drift

Earlier this year Ellis and other beekeepers tried, and failed, to persuade the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to put a temporary ban on the insecticide they blame. Since 2003 clothianidin, one in a family of a nicotine-based chemicals, has been coated on about 90 percent of the genetically modified seed corn planted in the United States. It was developed to replace older, more toxic insecticides that were applied directly to the soil, and to make crops poisonous to a wider range of pests. Some view it as more environmentally safe because it is absorbed by the corn as it grows and is contained in the plant.

Beekeepers say it's having unintended consequences. In the spring, said Ellis, huge machines crisscross the cornfields where his bees forage. The sticky corn seeds are coated with talc to make planting more uniform. But the contaminated powder blows across the land -- and the flowers that bees pollinate. Then they bring it back to the hives and their young, Ellis said.

Jack Boyne, an entomologist with the manufacturer Bayer CropScience, said that no studies have found the pesticide in bees or their hives at lethal doses. He said Bayer has studied bees that forage in canola plants treated with clothianidin.

"There was no effect on either the workers, the brood, the fecundity or the honey production," he said. Bees, he said, face other threats, including diseases and the loss of habitat.

Still, other scientists and beekeepers say something troubling is happening.

"It is an insecticide," Ellis said.

Recently researchers in Indiana found high concentrations of two insecticides in talc blown from corn planters. And they found them on dandelions around farm fields, in pollen stored in hives, and, in non-lethal doses, in the bees from nearby hives.

Two other studies found that such low-level exposure to the chemicals did have an effect on bees. One, conducted by French researchers, showed that the chemicals confused the bees, making it harder for them to find their way home. The other, by scientists in Britain, found that they keep wild bumblebees from supplying their hives with enough food to produce new queens.

The biggest unknown, however, is what happens when those low doses of insecticide are multiplied across tens of millions of acres. Mace Vaughan, a conservationist with the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, said that, scaled up to the size of the Midwest Corn Belt: "Well, that changes the game."

Josephine Marcotty • 612-673-7394

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Which is your favorite season?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close