Legislative auditor delivers harsh report on Minnesota's minority councils
March 14, 2014 — 4:58pm
Minnesota's Legislative Auditor on Friday delivered a harsh report on the state's four minority councils, finding little sign they have been effective.
"We identified six overarching problems: isolation from state policy making, lack of clear statutory purposes, inadequate identification of specific objectives and outcome measures, little substantive collaboration among the councils, untimely appointments and lack of attendance at council meetings, and poor communication with constituent organizations," Jim Nobles, the legislative auditor said in the report.
The councils for Asian-Pacific Minnesotans, Black Minnesotans, Chicano/Latino Affairs and Indian Affairs were allocated about $3 million last year and are expected to spend more in the next two years.
Although the councils have been around for decades -- the Council on Indian Affairs was created in 1963 -- the audit found that they've lacked clear goals or power. Members of some of the councils, the audit found, rarely attend meetings and others have not been true minority liaisons to state government.
The legislative auditor suggested the councils could be closed or absorbed into existing state agencies.
In response, some of the councils said they agreed with some of the findings and rejected others. The council for Asian-Pacific Minnesotans acknowledged the need for some improvement, for instance, but the Council on Black Minnesotans said that the report, "traps the reader in a litany of revisionist history."
Read both the report and the councils' responses below:
Interest groups spent less slightly money lobbying state government in 2015 than in the previous year, according to a report released Wednesday by the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board.
More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. It's an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.