The Minnesota House has voted in favor of a proposal that would require all smartphones and cell-connected tablet computers sold in Minnesota to feature an anti-theft "kill switch."
The House backed the bill Thursday by a vote of 73-58. The kill switch function is intended to allow the device's owner to remotely disable it if it's lost or stolen. The legislation also aims to prevent manufacturers and carriers from adding additional fees to customers for access to the technology.
Included in the proposal are provisions that attempt to crack down on the cell phone re-sale market. It requires used cell phone dealers to keep detailed records of phones purchased for re-sale, and requires sellers to sign a statement attesting that the device is not stolen.
Supporters of the proposal say it will crack down on one of the fastest growing crimes in Minnesota. The smartphone industry fought back against the bill, saying the requirement would not keep up with rapidly evolving technology and that it could hinder consumer choice. However, the smartphone industry has recently released details of a voluntary kill switch initiative among a number of major wireless carriers.
The Senate passed its own version of the bill last week. The two bills are different, meaning the Senate will either have to sign on to House changes or else the proposal will go to a conference committee.
Amid reports that Donald Trump was in danger of not getting on Minnesota's presidential ballot, the Trump campaign says everything is in order and voters will have a chance to cast their ballot for him in November.
The State Department says about 30 emails that may be related to the 2012 attack on U.S. compounds in Benghazi, Libya, are among the thousands of Hillary Clinton emails recovered during the FBI's recently closed investigation into her use of a private server.
Consumer Reports said Thursday that Tesla Motors is misleading car owners by calling its semi-autonomous driving system "Autopilot," potentially giving them too much trust in their car's ability to drive itself.
Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has written to lawmakers on behalf of Uber to argue against the use of fingerprint-based background checks as they consider how to regulate ride-hailing service drivers.