StarTribune.com
ED0921A07

Home | Opinion Exchange | Editorials

Editorial: On the prairie, slow the plow

Federal subsidies should protect grassland, not endanger it.

Last update: September 20, 2007 - 5:51 PM

In a crescent that sweeps from Detroit Lakes to Mankato, Minnesota has thousands of acres of prairie grassland that should never go under a farmer's plow. These grasses provide habitat for endangered wildfowl, filter the state's groundwater, serve as a buffer against flooding and hold topsoil that would otherwise blow away in stiff prairie winds.

Yet in the last decade farmers have been plowing up this land by the thousands of acres, converting pastures and rangeland to row crops at an accelerating pace.

One reason is the boom in ethanol and other biofuels, which has made corn and soybeans hugely more profitable than they were five years ago. But another reflects a perverse wrinkle in federal farm payments. Rep. Collin Peterson of Minnesota and Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa want to change that. They have proposed a simple, sensible change that would protect prairie grasslands while saving money for taxpayers, and it should be part of the farm bill that Congress will pass this fall.

A new study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) shows just how bad the problem is. More than 1 million acres of pasture and rangeland were converted to row crops between 1997 and 2003 in the Northern Plains states alone.

Attractive commodity prices and new seed technology were two reasons for the change. But a big factor was federal disaster payments and crop insurance that took the risk out of cultivating land that, for decades, was regarded as too risky. "Farm program payments provide significant incentive to convert grassland to cropland because they increase the expected profitability of farming while lowering the associated risks," the GAO found.

Harkin points out that there are good reasons why farmers left much of this land in prairie grass for decades: The soils are poor, the land is hilly, the regions are subject to drought. If the only reason farmers are converting valuable grassland to crops is that the government has absolved them of the natural risk, that's not good enough. Peterson has proposed a rule that would make converted grassland ineligible for federal crop insurance for four years; Harkin would go further, making converted grasslands permanently ineligible for a variety of federal payments.

Farmers of the Great Plains are stewards of some of the most valuable wilderness in the United States. They will always face a tension between profit and stewardship, but government subsidies should not tip that balance in the wrong direction.

 

Comment on this story  |  Read all 0 comments  |  Hide reader comments

Subscribe

About Opinion Exchange

Opinion Exchange is produced by the Editorial Department, which is dedicated to hosting the discussion on a range of issues of interest to Star Tribune readers online and in print. In its new format, it's our hope that Opinion Exhange will create a more dynamic dialogue between Star Tribune readers and the Editorial Board. Many individual posts will be written and signed by members of the Editorial Board and will reflect their own opinions. Daily editorials will continue to represent the institutional voice of the newspaper and be researched and written by the Editorial Department, which is independent of the newsroom.

Subscribe to RSS|Learn more about RSS

Dog Classified

New Home Wanted

Hundreds of puppies and dogs seeking new homes. Find one now!

Win tickets to the North Star Roller Girls' bout at the Minneapolis Convention Center.

Vita.mn presents the North Star Roller Girls' bout at the Minneapolis Convention Center on Dec. 27.

See all contests