us supreme court judge's conflict 110909
On the homepage
Vikings
Out There
Artcetera
Television
Supreme Court won't review case in which lawyer served as judge's re-election co-chairman
Print this story
E-mail this story
Save to del.icio.us
Share on Facebook
Share on Digg
Minnesota business by the numbers
See Minnesota's top earning companies, CEOs and non-profits
More from Business
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court will not review an $18 million verdict won by a lawyer who served as a co-chairman of the trial judge's re-election committee.
The court on Monday turned down a hospital's appeal in a case involving an infant who was seriously injured when a nurse hit his head on a night stand and then did not report the incident or seek treatment.
Brittany and Brandon Shinn successfully sued after their infant son, Nathan, suffered multiple skull fractures and a hematoma in the incident at Oklahoma Children's Hospital.
Nathan Shinn died on December 14, 2006, shortly after the jury verdict against HCA Health Services of Oklahoma, doing business as Children's Hospital at the University of Oklahoma Medical Center.
During the trial, HCA demanded that Oklahoma County District Judge Barbara Swinton recuse herself because Gerald Durbin, the Shinns' lawyer, served as a co-chairman of the trial judge's re-election committee.
Swinton was running unopposed. She said at trial that Durbin was only a formal co-chair and her husband was the person really running her re-election committee. She rejected the request to step aside, saying since she was running unopposed, there was no re-election campaign.
HCA unsuccessfully appealed Swinton's decision to preside during the trial, but did not make the issue part of its state court appeal after the $18 million verdict was handed down.
HCA said the Supreme Court should review the case, considering the court said in June that elected judges must step aside from cases when large campaign contributions from interested parties create the appearance of bias. Durbin contributed $1,000 to her campaign, but got $719.77 refunded because she was unopposed.
But the Shinns said the court should not get involved since HCA did not make the recusal question part of its state appeals.
The case is HCA Health Services of Oklahoma v. Shinn, 09-311.
Recent Business stories
Feds, Pennsylvania county sue company, contractor over alleged air pollution from slag dumping - November 9, 2009
Feds, Pennsylvania county sue company, contractor over alleged air pollution from slag dumping - The federal government and the Allegheny County Health Department have sued Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and a contractor for alleged air pollution violations at a slag dump near Pittsburgh. More
Blog: Patent Pending
Lights out at U energy conference. Irony police notified.
Just as Lawrence Kazmerski, a top official at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, was about to give the keynote address at the University of Minnesota's annual E3 conference at the RiverCentre in St. Paul, the lights went out, bathing the audience in darkness and a deep sense of irony.
Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments