us smoking ban south dakota 110309
On the homepage
Vikings
Out There
Pardon Board
Petters
Judge refuses secondhand smoke testimony in South Dakota smoking ban lawsuit
Print this story
E-mail this story
Save to del.icio.us
Share on Facebook
Share on Digg
Minnesota business by the numbers
See Minnesota's top earning companies, CEOs and non-profits
More from Business
PIERRE, S.D. - The American Cancer Society cannot present witnesses to testify on the dangers of secondhand smoke in a trial that will determine whether South Dakota's smoking ban will be referred to a statewide vote, a circuit judge has ruled.
The group argues that the new law, which would ban smoking in bars and casinos, cannot be referred to a public vote because it is necessary for the immediate preservation of public health. The South Dakota Constitution bars referendum votes on measures needed for the immediate preservation of the public health, peace or safety.
Circuit Judge Kathleen Trandahl of Winner said Monday that prior rulings by the South Dakota Supreme Court have established that courts decide whether a measure is necessary for the preservation of health, peace or safety based on the measure itself and other facts, not on evidence from witnesses or other documents.
Trandahl will hold a trial in the case Nov. 12-13.
The 2009 Legislature passed a law to ban smoking in bars, video lottery establishments and the casinos in Deadwood. The measure, which would extend a ban that has outlawed smoking in most workplaces and public areas since 2002, was to have taken effect July 1.
But bar and casino owners who contend the ban would drive away customers and interfere with business owners' rights collected signatures to force a public vote in the November 2010 election. Secretary of State Chris Nelson eventually rejected the petitions, ruling that too few valid signatures were collected.
The ban's opponents then asked the judge to order Nelson to reinstate some signatures and put the referendum on the ballot. The American Cancer Society has been allowed to intervene in the opponents' lawsuit against Nelson.
The bar and casino owners submitted 25,400 petition signatures seeking a public vote, which would delay the ban from taking effect pending the 2010 election outcome.
After the American Cancer Society challenged thousands of signatures, Nelson eventually ruled that more than 8,800 were invalid. In a document filed in court Monday, Nelson said further checking has led him to conclude that opponents of the ban have 61 fewer signatures than the 16,776 needed to put the measure on the ballot.
At next week's trial, Trandahl first will hear arguments on whether the ban is necessary for the immediate preservation of public health. If the state constitution prevents it from being put to a public vote, the lawsuit will be concluded, the judge said.
If she rules the measure can be referred because it is not necessary for the preservation of public health, Trandahl then will hear evidence on the validity of a number of challenged signatures.
Recent Business stories
Freddie Mac says losses related to Taylor, Bean bankruptcy 'could be significant' - November 3, 2009
Freddie Mac says losses related to Taylor, Bean bankruptcy 'could be significant' - Mortgage finance company Freddie Mac said Monday it could lose $500 million or more as a result of the bankruptcy protection filing of Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. More
- Holiday gift: Amazon-Wal-Mart price war
- Economy's rebound not as strong as first thought
- Record 2.1M dropside cribs recalled
- Verdict? Petters jurors back at it today
- A man with a plan to get jobless working stiffs back to work
- Stores jump the gun to get jump on competition
- Medtronic reports higher second-quarter earnings
Blog: Patent Pending
Lights out at U energy conference. Irony police notified.
Just as Lawrence Kazmerski, a top official at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, was about to give the keynote address at the University of Minnesota's annual E3 conference at the RiverCentre in St. Paul, the lights went out, bathing the audience in darkness and a deep sense of irony.
Comment on this story | Be the first to comment | Hide reader comments