StarTribune.com
valspar051308

Home | Business

Soft demand hits Valspar's profit and its outlook

The Minneapolis paintmaker said today that it's being hurt by higher costs for raw materials and softening demand because of the economy.

Last update: May 12, 2008 - 8:45 PM

Valspar Corp., the Minneapolis-based paintmaker, said Monday that second-quarter earnings declined 1.6 percent from a year ago, falling just short of analyst estimates. The company also cut its full-year earnings outlook, citing higher costs and soft demand.

In the quarter ended April 25, Valspar earned $40.8 million, or 38 cents a share, compared with $41.5 million, or 35 cents a share, a year ago. Revenue was up 3.5 percent, to $836.4 million.

Excluding a non-cash expense related to Valspar's minority shares in Huarun Paints, Valspar earned 41 cents a share in the quarter, compared with 40 cents a share a year ago. Analysts had expected 42 cents a share, according to Thomson First Call. Revenue also fell short of the consensus analyst expectation of $865.6 million.

For the full fiscal year, Valspar said it now expects adjusted net income per share of $1.55 to $1.65, down from the company's previous estimate of $1.65 to $1.75.

"Raw material costs have increased beyond our prior expectations, and we anticipate demand in the U.S. to remain soft for the rest of the year," Valspar CEO William Mansfield said in a prepared statement. "We are responding with additional pricing actions, and remain focused on aggressively reducing costs, gaining new business and investing in our long-term growth opportunities."

In trading Monday, Valspar shares opened lower, then recovered to close at $21.88, up 1 cent.

STAFF REPORT

2nd quarter FY2008, 4/25

2008 2007 % chg. Revenue $836.4 $808.5 +3.5 Income 40.8 41.5 -1.6 Net/cm 37.9 36.4 +4.1 Earn/share 0.38 0.35 +8.6

6 months

Revenue $1,601.5 $1,503.0 +6.6 Income 64.9 65.1 -0.4 Net/cm 59.0 55.0 +7.4 Earn/share 0.59 0.53 +11.3

Figures in millions except for earnings per share.

Comment on this story  |  Be the first to comment  |  Hide reader comments

Subscribe

Blog: Patent Pending

Wisconsin kicks our butt

Yee gads!  We already know that Wisconsin has superior angel tax credits than Minnesota (and by superior, I mean it actually HAS them) but this is getting ridiculous. It would be perfectly understandable if the Badger State wanted to sit on its laurels and count the Minnesota startups fleeing to Madison or Hudson. Instead, as Minnesota [...]

Recent posts