StarTribune.com
fanniemae080107

Home | Business

Judge dismisses some claims in Fannie Mae lawsuit

Last update: July 31, 2007 - 1:52 PM

WASHINGTON — A group of shareholders who opted out of a class-action lawsuit against Fannie Mae saw many of their own claims against the mortgage giant dismissed Tuesday.

The group, led by Evergreen Equity Trust and Franklin Managed Trust, sued in connection with a massive accounting scandal. The investors accused the company and its executives of violating a number of state and federal securities laws.

U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon dismissed all but a handful of the claims. He dismissed some charges because they were filed after the statute of limitations had expired. Leon also said federal law does not allow the investors to sue for violation of state laws. The investors argued that was unfair.

"That is an argument better made to Congress!" Leon wrote.

Leon also dismissed allegations of wrongdoing against insurance company Radian Guaranty Inc. and members of the Fannie Mae Auditors Committee. He let stand some securities charges and insider trading allegations against Timothy Howard, Fannie Mae's former chief financial officer.

Fannie Mae, the second-largest U.S. financial institution after Citigroup Inc., buys mortgage loans from lenders, packages the loans and sells them as mortgage-backed bonds. Regulators accused the company in 2004 of serious accounting problems, fined it $400 million and ordered it to restate earnings back to 2001.

The company ousted its executives and, when it corrected its past earnings statements, it wiped out $6.3 billion in profit. It has spent more than $1 billion correcting its accounting practices.

Evergreen Equity Trust and Franklin Managed Trust opted out of a class-action shareholder lawsuit last year. Tuesday's ruling does not affect that case, which is still pending.

Comment on this story  |  Be the first to comment  |  Hide reader comments

Subscribe

Blog: Patent Pending

Wisconsin kicks our butt

Yee gads!  We already know that Wisconsin has superior angel tax credits than Minnesota (and by superior, I mean it actually HAS them) but this is getting ridiculous. It would be perfectly understandable if the Badger State wanted to sit on its laurels and count the Minnesota startups fleeing to Madison or Hudson. Instead, as Minnesota [...]

Recent posts